Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Purged, Hacked, Switched: On Election Fraud Allegations in Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders [View all]
May 12, 2016
Purged, Hacked, Switched: On Election Fraud Allegations in Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders
by Doug Johnson Hatlem--Counter Punch
Antonio Gonzalez of the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project (SVREP) is no stranger to exit polling misses. Gonzalez ran a national exit poll of Latino voters in 2004 that proved more correct than Edison Researchs polling for the National Election Pool, but has defended Edison against claims that they misread the Latina and Latino vote in the Nevada caucuses on the Democratic side in 2016. Last week I asked Gonzalez why exit polls are missing so badly for primaries between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders. The exit polls, he believes, were accurate in who actually turned out, in who tried to vote.
A woman named Chloe (whose personal information is otherwise redacted below) describes registering as a new voter more than a week before New Yorks deadline with the Department of Motor Vehicles. In spite of persistent efforts, including a record of more than a dozen calls and emails stretching to page fifteen of Exhibit A in Election Justice USA (EJUSA)s lawsuit filed in New York City, Chloe still has not been registered as a Democrat.
Included in well over a hundred of pages of similar proofs in the Exhibits, another denied voter named Daniel provided a copy of an email sent by Debbie Wasserman Schultz to registered Democrats on April 19, the day of the New York election, encouraging them to get out and vote. Daniels registration was purged or switched in the 24 hours before he tried, and was denied, the right to vote.
While Gonzalez attributes much of the trouble in New York and Arizona to confusion over who was eligible to vote, CounterPunch has reviewed details and supporting evidence from databases of voters wrongly denied the right to vote in closed primary contests between Clinton and Sanders. Three databases with records of over a thousand cases show that would-be voters who followed proper procedures to register as Democrats were disenfranchised either denied the right to vote or forced to vote provisionally or by affidavit.
For those who did vote provisionally or by affidavit, the vast majority of their votes have not counted. This includes 91,000 uncounted affidavit ballots in New York City alone and 20,000 uncounted provisional ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona. For Arizona, CounterPunch reviewed each individual record in a 151 person database collected and published by the online collective Anonymous. Details of 716 entries in a denied-voter database are summarized in Exhibit I of EJUSAs New York City lawsuit. The third database includes records from would-be voters experiencing registration problems in a wide variety of states from California (which does not vote until June 7th) to Pennsylvania as well as more than one hundred cases, from counties throughout New York, that have not yet been incorporated into EJUSAs lawsuits. EJUSA gave us limited access to the databases for verification purposes.
The impacts of registrations denied or switched and of voters improperly purged from voting rolls, even when they followed stated laws and procedures, goes well beyond those 100,000+ uncounted ballots, however. Thousands more voters appear to have been denied ballots altogether or simply stayed home when online State records told them they would not be allowed to have their vote counted. The only available conclusion is that forces supporting the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton were willing to use any means necessary legal, gray, or flatly illegal to put down the Bernie Sanders insurgency that threatened to upend Clintons coronation as the presumptive Democratic nominee.
CounterPunch has obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed by EJUSA in New York City and the accompanying Exhibits. Together with the databases and emerging story, they paint a picture of a Democratic machine every bit as corrupt as the Tammany bosses of the 1920s and 1930s who opposed Franklin Delano Roosevelt at every turn.
Purged, Hacked, Switched: On Election Fraud Allegations in Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders
by Doug Johnson Hatlem--Counter Punch
Antonio Gonzalez of the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project (SVREP) is no stranger to exit polling misses. Gonzalez ran a national exit poll of Latino voters in 2004 that proved more correct than Edison Researchs polling for the National Election Pool, but has defended Edison against claims that they misread the Latina and Latino vote in the Nevada caucuses on the Democratic side in 2016. Last week I asked Gonzalez why exit polls are missing so badly for primaries between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders. The exit polls, he believes, were accurate in who actually turned out, in who tried to vote.
A woman named Chloe (whose personal information is otherwise redacted below) describes registering as a new voter more than a week before New Yorks deadline with the Department of Motor Vehicles. In spite of persistent efforts, including a record of more than a dozen calls and emails stretching to page fifteen of Exhibit A in Election Justice USA (EJUSA)s lawsuit filed in New York City, Chloe still has not been registered as a Democrat.
Included in well over a hundred of pages of similar proofs in the Exhibits, another denied voter named Daniel provided a copy of an email sent by Debbie Wasserman Schultz to registered Democrats on April 19, the day of the New York election, encouraging them to get out and vote. Daniels registration was purged or switched in the 24 hours before he tried, and was denied, the right to vote.
While Gonzalez attributes much of the trouble in New York and Arizona to confusion over who was eligible to vote, CounterPunch has reviewed details and supporting evidence from databases of voters wrongly denied the right to vote in closed primary contests between Clinton and Sanders. Three databases with records of over a thousand cases show that would-be voters who followed proper procedures to register as Democrats were disenfranchised either denied the right to vote or forced to vote provisionally or by affidavit.
For those who did vote provisionally or by affidavit, the vast majority of their votes have not counted. This includes 91,000 uncounted affidavit ballots in New York City alone and 20,000 uncounted provisional ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona. For Arizona, CounterPunch reviewed each individual record in a 151 person database collected and published by the online collective Anonymous. Details of 716 entries in a denied-voter database are summarized in Exhibit I of EJUSAs New York City lawsuit. The third database includes records from would-be voters experiencing registration problems in a wide variety of states from California (which does not vote until June 7th) to Pennsylvania as well as more than one hundred cases, from counties throughout New York, that have not yet been incorporated into EJUSAs lawsuits. EJUSA gave us limited access to the databases for verification purposes.
The impacts of registrations denied or switched and of voters improperly purged from voting rolls, even when they followed stated laws and procedures, goes well beyond those 100,000+ uncounted ballots, however. Thousands more voters appear to have been denied ballots altogether or simply stayed home when online State records told them they would not be allowed to have their vote counted. The only available conclusion is that forces supporting the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton were willing to use any means necessary legal, gray, or flatly illegal to put down the Bernie Sanders insurgency that threatened to upend Clintons coronation as the presumptive Democratic nominee.
CounterPunch has obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed by EJUSA in New York City and the accompanying Exhibits. Together with the databases and emerging story, they paint a picture of a Democratic machine every bit as corrupt as the Tammany bosses of the 1920s and 1930s who opposed Franklin Delano Roosevelt at every turn.
---------------------
More of long article describing latest findings of Election Tamperings in Arizona and New York:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/12/purged-hacked-switched-on-election-fraud-allegations-in-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
81 replies, 11740 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (80)
ReplyReply to this post
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Purged, Hacked, Switched: On Election Fraud Allegations in Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders [View all]
KoKo
May 2016
OP
Sorry. Someone replied to me only today, suggesting winning was all that mattered.
merrily
May 2016
#28
Garbage is denying the difference between the primary and the general, when your
merrily
May 2016
#44
Every time I have seen HRC supporters here either laughing putting up tin foil hats
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#56
Her number #1 contributor owns the company (and his daughter is on the board)
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#65
It makes no sense whatsoever to blame Bernie supporters for something Hillary...
dchill
May 2016
#80
Well unlike many Bernie voters here, I'm a Dem first and a Bernie voter second.
LonePirate
May 2016
#40
Ah, you must be one of those purists. The lack of acceptance of a differing view was a big tip-off.
LonePirate
May 2016
#45
Votes can be flipped in 60 seconds where it that vidoe hmmm I think her machine
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#59
Someone is busy trying to make liberals think voting is rigged, to suppress their votes only and to
L. Coyote
May 2016
#11
And people fall for their BS faster than for a child discovering the lost secrets of the Maya
L. Coyote
May 2016
#23
Oh give it a rest. That same crap has been posted on DU for years and every time it's just
merrily
May 2016
#34
There is no big mystery about AZ. Hillary had much stronger support among older voters
pnwmom
May 2016
#12
It is a FACT that exit polls in AZ didn't count absentee voters, and older people
pnwmom
May 2016
#17
What fraud was proven in Arizona? They shouldn't have shut down the polling places,
pnwmom
May 2016
#24
So are you arguing against absentee ballots? Both Washington and Oregon do all mail-in
pnwmom
May 2016
#26
You are conflating very different kinds of absentee ballots.But, you knew that.
merrily
May 2016
#36
Thousands of absentee ballots hand delivered. Who could fake something like that?
merrily
May 2016
#42