Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: Monsanto and the Poisoning of Europe [View all]polly7
(20,582 posts)23. Behind India’s ‘Epidemic’ Of Farmer Suicides
BY BEENISH AHMED APR 17, 2015 2:50 PM
Vandana Shiva, Indias most prominent environmental activist, believes genetically-modified seeds specifically, those sold by the agricultural behemoth Monsanto are driving farmers to lose control of their own farming practices. Shes claimed that the frustrations over Monsantos proprietary policies which forbid farmers from planting, selling, or even accidentally growing seeds from Monsantos patented crops push farmers to the brink. Shiva and other environmental activists have come to refer to Monsanto seeds as suicide seeds.
In 2013, she explained her argument, citing one of Monsantos genitically-modified cotton seeds as an example.
Monsantos seed monopolies, the destruction of alternatives, the collection of superprofits in the form of royalties, and the increasing vulnerability of monocultures has created a context for debt, suicides and agrarian distress which is driving the farmers suicide epidemic in India, Shiva wrote. This systemic control has been intensified with Bt cotton. That is why most suicides are in the cotton belt.
But many researchers have started to take issue with the notion that genetically-modified crops like Monsantos Bt cotton are to blame for Indias epidemic of farmer suicides. Some have pointed out that Indian farmers continued to purchase Monsanto seeds even as activists railed against them and for good reason: because it proved profitable to do so.
For its part, Monsanto has argued that its crops require less pesticide purchase and less loss of yield meaning that farmers who opted for its genetically-modified seeds would be more successful than those who use traditional seeds.
But Shiva has countered, claiming that Monsanto drove up the price of seeds 8,000 percent and that the high costs of purchased seed and chemicals have created a debt trap.
Since debt is a major cause to farmers despair, however, its not just agricultural companies like Monsanto who are responsible. For those seeking loans to pay higher up-front costs for Monsanto seeds, unfair lending practices increase their financial woes.
Anoop Sadanadan, a professor of political science based at Syracuse University, has argued that farmer suicides should be attributed not to agricultural practices but rather financial ones. In a paper published last year, he noted that farmer suicides were concentrated in five of Indias 28 states and that those five offered the least institutional credit to farmers, forcing them to take out private loans at interest rates as high as 45 percent.
In 2013, she explained her argument, citing one of Monsantos genitically-modified cotton seeds as an example.
Monsantos seed monopolies, the destruction of alternatives, the collection of superprofits in the form of royalties, and the increasing vulnerability of monocultures has created a context for debt, suicides and agrarian distress which is driving the farmers suicide epidemic in India, Shiva wrote. This systemic control has been intensified with Bt cotton. That is why most suicides are in the cotton belt.
But many researchers have started to take issue with the notion that genetically-modified crops like Monsantos Bt cotton are to blame for Indias epidemic of farmer suicides. Some have pointed out that Indian farmers continued to purchase Monsanto seeds even as activists railed against them and for good reason: because it proved profitable to do so.
For its part, Monsanto has argued that its crops require less pesticide purchase and less loss of yield meaning that farmers who opted for its genetically-modified seeds would be more successful than those who use traditional seeds.
But Shiva has countered, claiming that Monsanto drove up the price of seeds 8,000 percent and that the high costs of purchased seed and chemicals have created a debt trap.
Since debt is a major cause to farmers despair, however, its not just agricultural companies like Monsanto who are responsible. For those seeking loans to pay higher up-front costs for Monsanto seeds, unfair lending practices increase their financial woes.
Anoop Sadanadan, a professor of political science based at Syracuse University, has argued that farmer suicides should be attributed not to agricultural practices but rather financial ones. In a paper published last year, he noted that farmer suicides were concentrated in five of Indias 28 states and that those five offered the least institutional credit to farmers, forcing them to take out private loans at interest rates as high as 45 percent.
Full article: http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015/04/17/3648423/india-farmer-suicide/
I have personal experience with Monsanto planting crops up here and followed very, very closely Percy Schmeiser's fight with them. I know how fucking evil they are, so save your crap.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/25/percy-schmeiser-farmer-who-beat-monsanto.aspx
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, your posts are pathetic look at me crap that idolize a poison giant you seem
polly7
May 2016
#19
Doubling down with Shiva and Mercola doesn't make the lies about India's suicides go away.
HuckleB
May 2016
#25
Anyone who uses the right wing quack Mercola as a source obviously doesn't have a "fucking clue" one
Major Nikon
May 2016
#32
Sure, that's why you have to parrot out a right wing quack and AIDS denialist for your proof
Major Nikon
May 2016
#34
Perhaps, but I don't have to rely on right wing AIDS deniers and loony bins for my evidence
Major Nikon
May 2016
#38
Awww ........... need a little teeny fiddle for your poor, poor Monsanto - the perpetual victim?
polly7
May 2016
#39
Do you really think your easily debunked lies are doing your cause any good?
Major Nikon
May 2016
#40
Pretty stupid of you. Here's Bill Nye pointing out how the Monarch butterfies were decimated
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#47
Pretty stupid of you to quote Nye completely out of context and pretend that's what he meant
Major Nikon
May 2016
#50
Quote seems pretty on target to me as a response to your Facebook crap. Also,
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#59
Right, because poisons are always so safe and this multi-billion dollar industry has nothing
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#8
I know enough to avoid poisons and not want them used. the simplistic WHO procouncement,
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#24
No, but anyone who spews the significance of IARC classifications probably should
Major Nikon
May 2016
#29
Disengenuous apples and oranges comparisons. I am also not only relying on the IARC, as you seem
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#45
No, you call me a "Conspiracy theorist". Fuck you. How's that for telling?
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#54
We are talking about Roundup, and man made poisons and the mega-corporations behind
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#53
I did. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say. I do take this from the end, which
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#56
No, you prefer to support exsiting posions, I prefer to call them what they are. Poison and it
FighttheFuture
May 2016
#58