Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But he did. oldandhappy May 2016 #1
No Sanders did not. Nitram May 2016 #33
No chairs were thrown, we've all seen the video- Baobab May 2016 #44
Did I say anything about chairs? Nitram May 2016 #46
Yeah. But that is too fact based for the people that brought you "Bernie is a sexist, racist, bigot, GoneFishin May 2016 #51
Keep spreading those lies. It makes you look stupid but you don't care. Winning... think May 2016 #2
Using the word "Winning" in this context is about as stupid and irrelevant as anything Nitram May 2016 #34
"Winning" was referring to Hillary supporters who don't care about spreading lies like chairs being think May 2016 #37
And you're too focused on "winning" to see how out of control the Bernie crowd has become. Nitram May 2016 #41
Go Bernie liberal from boston May 2016 #61
You should try watching TV-news instead of whatever you're trying to accomplish. dmosh42 May 2016 #3
What a dishonest, FU OP article. merrily May 2016 #4
It is, but the article shows very distinctly what is taking place. Kos, Brock and others have to LiberalArkie May 2016 #7
What is taking place? For 1 thing, people are willing to lie at KOS and to repost KOS lies here. merrily May 2016 #9
Well no one ever said Kos wasn't a tool of the powers that be. Kos is willing to LiberalArkie May 2016 #10
Using the CIA term "conspiracy theory" is just another example of RW authoritarian bullshit. merrily May 2016 #13
I liked Eridani's reply LiberalArkie May 2016 #16
There are facts and then there are opinions and theories. The term CT itself is a CIA weapon. merrily May 2016 #17
I get a headache when I read too much over there, the thought processes are so much higher LiberalArkie May 2016 #18
It's amusing to see you get so worked up about lies Zorro May 2016 #12
Knowing you need to post a bs post from KOS and then engage in false equivalencies as to me says merrily May 2016 #14
Nothing false about it. It's spot on. Zorro May 2016 #20
LOL! ok nt merrily May 2016 #21
Only thing is... rgbecker May 2016 #5
The ONLY violence in Nevada appeared in the lies of Hillary's supporters and surrogates. Hillary's merrily May 2016 #22
You don't consider death threats and misogynistic venom a kind of violence? Nitram May 2016 #35
That you even have to say "a kind of violence" answers your question. merrily May 2016 #38
Sorry, merrily, verbal abuse is assault, and that is violence. Nitram May 2016 #39
So, if I leave a nasty message on your answering machine, that's assault? merrily May 2016 #40
You decide if you think this is violence. It would be considered domestic violence. Nitram May 2016 #42
So, no statute saying a very nasty message on an answering machine is assault, much less battery? merrily May 2016 #43
Not true. If a credible threat is made, it is considered assault. Nitram May 2016 #45
So, still no statute. merrily May 2016 #47
Title XLVI CRIMES Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE Nitram May 2016 #48
Sorry, no cigar. See Reply 52, and, bear in mind, criminal statutes are construed narrowly. merrily May 2016 #54
2015 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 609 Section 609.224 Nitram May 2016 #49
IMMEDIATE See reply 52. merrily May 2016 #53
Texas PENAL CODE TITLE 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON CHAPTER 22. ASSAULTIVE OFFENSES Nitram May 2016 #50
IMMINENT being the key word. Sorry.A nasty message on an answering message doesn't fit the statute. merrily May 2016 #52
And you immediately know when you receive a phone call or email that the person Nitram May 2016 #55
Sorry. IMMEDIATELY means immediately--and criminal statues are, as posted above, construed merrily May 2016 #56
I'll leave you with the legalistic and narrowly-defined concept of violence with which you... Nitram May 2016 #57
Yes, criminal statutes are both legalistic and narrowly defined. merrily May 2016 #58
Hi, Merrily, I thought this article might interest you. Nitram May 2016 #59
Not sure why you thought that, but I appreciate the thought anyway. merrily May 2016 #60
"Some people threw chairs..." The article starts with lies. Here is a video that shows the truth: xocet May 2016 #6
Only a Hillary supporter has been arrested for violence. onecaliberal May 2016 #8
Looks like Kos goes under the bus now Zorro May 2016 #11
Now? Really? DUers haven't posted for years about Markos' RW and CIA ties? More deceit. nt merrily May 2016 #15
And the smears against Democrats from BS puritans continue! Zorro May 2016 #19
Pointing out lies in a KOS post = contempt for the Party now? That's more deceit. merrily May 2016 #23
Keep plucking that chicken! Zorro May 2016 #24
Keep posting deceptive things to keep this thread kicked! merrily May 2016 #25
Nothing deceptive about my posts Zorro May 2016 #32
Gasp portlander23 May 2016 #26
Yep rock May 2016 #27
Honesty & Integrity pmorlan1 May 2016 #28
His reputation is not as shiny as you portray rock May 2016 #29
Yup. Bernie had me fooled. Now we're seeing his true colors. Nitram May 2016 #36
Hillary is an expert at rationalizing violence WDIM May 2016 #30
Quoting from The Daily Hillary...nice Raster May 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The problem isn't Bernie ...»Reply #27