Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: How the Hell We Got Here: Why the Democratic Party is Splitting [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)108. By covering for them, he did more than legitimize it.
He became a willing accessory to the War Crimes.
The Geneva Convention (and several others that the US has signed) has made it LAW that torture (and other War Crimes) MUST be investigated and prosecuted.
It is NOT an option.
"On becoming party to the Geneva Conventions, States undertake to enact any legislation necessary to punish persons guilty of grave breaches of the Conventions. States are also bound to prosecute in their own courts any person suspected of having committed a grave breach of the Conventions, or to hand that person over for judgment to another State. In other words, perpetrators of grave breaches, i.e. war criminals, must be prosecuted at all times and in all places, and States are responsible for ensuring that this is done.
"International humanitarian law goes further in that it requires States to seek out and punish any person who has committed a grave breach, irrespective of his nationality or the place where the offence was committed."
<snip>
What is a war crime?
*wilful killing of a protected person (e.g. wounded or sick combatant, prisoner of war, civilian);
*torture or inhuman treatment of a protected person;
*wilfully causing great suffering to, or serious injury to the body or health of, a protected person;
*attacking the civilian population;
*unlawful deportation or transfer;
*using prohibited weapons or methods of warfare;
*making improper use of the distinctive red cross or red crescent emblem or other protective signs;
*killing or wounding perfidiously individuals belonging to a hostile nation or army;
*pillage of public or private property.
<more>
https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/5kzmnu.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thanks! This section on the Clinton Machine's Media domination is worth re-posting:
NewImproved Deal
May 2016
#1
The drumbeats for the Iraq war seem so familiar now....just like the coronation drumbeats.
bbgrunt
May 2016
#36
So either folks here are democrats who support the party regardless where the party goes...
PoliticalMalcontent
May 2016
#21
No, actually it is not. I and millions of others are TIRED of getting screwed by
PatrickforO
May 2016
#30
How many primaries have you seen? When did you begin to vote? When did you register?
Ford_Prefect
May 2016
#69
We are split now. The People thru Sen Sanders are fighting, in some cases literally, for their lives
rhett o rick
May 2016
#113
So you admit that Sanders supporters haven't been violent. Well I agree but if you've
rhett o rick
May 2016
#122
the party is not splitting. the opportunist hijacking the party for his own gain is doing the
msongs
May 2016
#3
And doing it badly. 70% of BS voters are reasonable people who have said they will vote for Hillary.
Squinch
May 2016
#6
Clinton taking money has jack to do with the election as for the article *meh*the Democrats have
cstanleytech
May 2016
#14
Well said. Millions in this country feel they have no representation anymore. Bernie gives them
RKP5637
May 2016
#57
Exactly!!! I've talked to some of them, they say Trump is the only one addressing their
RKP5637
May 2016
#109
Not a smart move then to join the party where people are "rolling their eyes at him".
brush
May 2016
#68
Interpret it how you want. It still doesn't make sense to me to join a party and then commense . . .
brush
May 2016
#82
Democrats like me really like him and want him, not Hillary, to be president.
AlbertCat
May 2016
#72
Attacking the party you're a member of publicly over and over, never been done before.
brush
May 2016
#65
I'd be wrong only if Sanders wins, but the math tells me that is not in the cards.
brush
May 2016
#83
Okay, whatever you say. Your post is tiresome and full or the usual Sanders rhetoric
brush
May 2016
#93
I disagree. It's because so many people finally got fed up with the corporate wing.
Jim Lane
May 2016
#44
True. The insults and condescension just reduced the chances for reconciliation. [n/t]
Maedhros
May 2016
#75
I have visited the Democratic Underground for all my news for 13 years or better but never engaged
Machineland
May 2016
#134