Editorials & Other Articles

longship

(40,416 posts)

36. Wow! You really nail it here.

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:17 PM

Jun 2016

And in this entire subthread.

I support Bernie and will support the Democratic nominee, which increasingly looks like will be Hillary. However, your very reasoned and reasonable argument is one I can support.

R& for your responses in this thread alone.

Thank you very much for laying it all out without childish playground tactics or name calling. Much appreciated.

My best to you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Times Reporter Asks Sanders If He’s Sexist For Continuing To Run Against Hillary [View all] Mohammed_Lee Jun 2016 OP

Good question, actually. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #1

How is it sexist? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #2

Bernie endorsed Obama before the convention in 2008 and called him the Nominee. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #9

He's a candidate now. Representing a whole lot of people, to whom he has a responsibility. There is highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #11

so he should change his principles because of people who gave him money? MariaThinks Jun 2016 #12

Just because your candidate has the lowest principles of just about anybody in politics, doesn't highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #17

i'm giving you facts and statements Bernie made. You're giving me right wing talking points. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #19

Some day you'll learn to think on your own without the birdseed you've been given by the mistaken highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #22

you attack personally, yet i wonder how quickly my posts would get hidden if i attacked you MariaThinks Jun 2016 #23

I'm sorry for the personal. Not worthy. But here's the deal. You are arguing with me by bringing highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #25

Wow! You really nail it here. longship Jun 2016 #36

thanks - that's a good reasonable argument. Wishing you the best. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #37

Thank you. And to you and to all of us as well. Be well. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #38

NO analogy. elleng Jun 2016 #16

just like Bernie's superdelegates should not overrule voters 3 months ago - to his recent statement MariaThinks Jun 2016 #20

No analogy. elleng Jun 2016 #24

RIDICULOUS question. elleng Jun 2016 #13

Laughable question. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #30

That's MSM fucked up logic. It's rampant here. floriduck Jun 2016 #3

Was it racist for Clinton to keep running against Obama in the primary'08?? Person 2713 Jun 2016 #4

She didn't. In a tighter race than today, she graciously accepted defeat and did what was best for MariaThinks Jun 2016 #10

No, she argued for Pledged delegates to switch to her. yodermon Jun 2016 #26

And ended up as SOS. Not a bad loss. libdem4life Jun 2016 #28

She bargained for SoS. Obama was set to pick Kerry, but she interrupted for 4 years. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #31

I agree...except they were pretty heady years on the financial front. libdem4life Jun 2016 #33

Oh My pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #5

IMO its a stupid question. exisiting is not sexist. nt msongs Jun 2016 #6

Totally speechless. I feel for Bernie dealing with these reporters. yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #7

It's sexist to treat men and women differently because of their gender. uppityperson Jun 2016 #8

What amazes me is that Bernie and his campaign seemed surprised... CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #14

What a disgusting person ... Trajan Jun 2016 #15

The question is sexist. (nt) enough Jun 2016 #18

That was a bad question. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #21

A woman reporter asks Bernie if he's sexist ... left-of-center2012 Jun 2016 #27

What was the answer?...only when a female wins? Ok for black guy... beachbumbob Jun 2016 #29

The Daily Caller? I thought you guys screamed at links to RW sites like that. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #32

Only in carefully selected situations...that would be libdem4life Jun 2016 #34

Yamiche Alcindor should go back to writing cloudbase Jun 2016 #35