Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 03:26 PM Jun 2016

Nation:  What the Democrats Must Learn From Brexit About Free-Trade Deals [View all]

Sanders and Clinton are right to oppose the TPP, and the Democratic Party should do the same.

By John Nichols


<snip>

 The Leave campaigners in the UK succeeded because there are millions of working-class voters—many of them in the left-leaning “Labour heartlands” of northern England—who know that globalization has not worked for them. Well, there are millions of Americans in battleground states such as Ohio, Michigan, Missouri, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina who know that globalization has not worked for them.

Clinton got it right Sunday when she told the US Conference of Mayors, “Just as we have seen there are many frustrated people in Britain, we know there are frustrated people here at home, too.”

While a substantial portion of British voters blamed the European Union for the misery of austerity and deindustrialization, a substantial number of American voters blame the misery of austerity and deindustrialization on free-trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement, permanent normalization of trade relations with China, and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership deal. There is broad agreement with the assessment of groups such as Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch and the Citizen Trade Campaign, which have explained that corporate-friendly free-trade deals have harmed workers, farmers, small-business owners, communities, and the environment. This is one of the reasons TPP-critic Bernie Sanders ran so well in the Democratic primaries, and Clinton (who once praised the TPP) now says she is opposed to the agreement.

The shared anti-TPP stance of the two Democratic contenders led to speculation that the Democratic platform, as drafted by a 15-member committee made up of Clinton backers, Sanders backers,and others, might formally line up the party in opposition to the agreement.

When the platform-drafting committee took up the issue in St. Louis last week, Congressman Keith Ellison, the Minnesota Democrat who serves as a cochair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, proposed to add language rejecting the trade deal. But the proposal was defeated, after Clinton-allied drafting committee members said they did not want to go on record against a deal that has been backed by President Obama.

Ellison, who was one of Obama’s first backers when he ran for the presidency in 2008, says, “I am disappointed that my amendment to take a strong stand against the Trans-Pacific Partnership—a position shared by both Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders—was not included.” The congressman argues that it is vital to take a strong stand against the TPP, and he is encouraging the full platform committee to adopt his anti-TPP amendment when it meets in July.

<snip>

https://www.thenation.com/article/what-the-democrats-must-learn-about-free-trade-deals-from-brexit/
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lee Atwater Said billhicks76 Jun 2016 #1
. Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #2
That's from 2012, and she was praising the fair trade & worker protection TPP goals. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #18
It isn't about the primary. Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #19
It's anti-Hillary propaganda. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #20
Then why did the administrators reinstate the post Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #21
Ask the Admins why it was reinstated. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #35
The message from the administrators was that it did not break the rules. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #36
The title of the video is a lie, as I note above. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #39
Her exact words can't be a lie. She said it. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #41
The title is not "her exact words." Why did you post the video? SunSeeker Jul 2016 #42
A 45 second video of Hillary speaking is anti-Hillary propaganda? merrily Jul 2016 #27
Reality is no longer acceptable. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #33
The title of the video is a lie, as I note above. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #34
No. It is.a.quote. n/t Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #37
No, the title of the video is a lie. Hillary does not support the TPP. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #38
Her exact quote is... Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #40
The "this TPP" she was talking about were the TPP goals set out back in 2012. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #43
I posted the video to show her record on trade. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #44
No, you falsely presented her as being pro-TPP, by posting a video with a false headline. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #45
The headline is not false Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #46
The video's headline is false. It implies she supports the TPP. She does not. nt SunSeeker Jul 2016 #47
Her statement was made in the present tense without qualification. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #48
It was indeed stated in the present tense, IN 2012. BEFORE the terms we now have were set. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #49
Hillary does not oppose TPP. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #3
plz Cryptoad Jun 2016 #7
If Obama doesn't get it through Congress then Hillary will. Mark my words. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #10
No shortage of seers around these here parts........ Cryptoad Jun 2016 #11
I'm not arrogant enough to believe Americans aren't stupid enough to elect Trump. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #15
Poppy did not get NAFTA through Congress. merrily Jul 2016 #28
13 Democratic senators voted to fast-track tpp: elleng Jun 2016 #4
So, Brexit is a good thing? tirebiter Jun 2016 #5
Only those who BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #12
"Sanders and Clinton are right to oppose the TPP"? Android3.14 Jun 2016 #6
the uninformed? Cryptoad Jun 2016 #8
Or the willfully ignorant. Android3.14 Jun 2016 #16
Globalization is not the problem. Low wages, shitty jobs, & wealth inequality are the problems Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #9
Thanks for lots of good BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #13
Gosh darn it, How do I Rec a post? Sentath Jun 2016 #14
Sounds good to me. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #17
Corporate control of the globalization is the problem seabeckind Jul 2016 #22
As I said (in title), wealth inequality is one of the roots. You agree when you ref "oligopoly". nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #23
No, I don't agree. seabeckind Jul 2016 #24
An un-wealthy oligopoly is toothless. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #25
False equivalency. seabeckind Jul 2016 #26
Non-equivalency. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #30
+1 Trying to maximize profits for stockholders is a legal corporate duty. merrily Jul 2016 #29
Yes it is. seabeckind Jul 2016 #31
I know what you are saying, but both CAN exist with proper regulation. merrily Jul 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nation:  What the...