Editorials & Other Articles

SunSeeker

(58,374 posts)

18. That's from 2012, and she was praising the fair trade & worker protection TPP goals.

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 09:56 PM

Jun 2016

She was not talking about the actual TPP terms that were hammered out well after she left the State Department. The headline on that video is misleading. As you know, after she reviewed the actual terms that were released some months ago, she determined they failed to meet those goals and she stated her opposition to the TPP as it is now written.

But you knew that, Motown_Johnny. And yet you continue to relitigate the Dem primary with the same bogus anti-Hillary propaganda. It really is time to move on.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nation: What the Democrats Must Learn From Brexit About Free-Trade Deals [View all] villager Jun 2016 OP

Lee Atwater Said billhicks76 Jun 2016 #1

. Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #2

That's from 2012, and she was praising the fair trade & worker protection TPP goals. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #18

It isn't about the primary. Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #19

It's anti-Hillary propaganda. nt SunSeeker Jun 2016 #20

Then why did the administrators reinstate the post Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #21

Ask the Admins why it was reinstated. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #35

The message from the administrators was that it did not break the rules. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #36

The title of the video is a lie, as I note above. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #39

Her exact words can't be a lie. She said it. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #41

The title is not "her exact words." Why did you post the video? SunSeeker Jul 2016 #42

A 45 second video of Hillary speaking is anti-Hillary propaganda? merrily Jul 2016 #27

Reality is no longer acceptable. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #33

The title of the video is a lie, as I note above. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #34

No. It is.a.quote. n/t Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #37

No, the title of the video is a lie. Hillary does not support the TPP. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #38

Her exact quote is... Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #40

The "this TPP" she was talking about were the TPP goals set out back in 2012. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #43

I posted the video to show her record on trade. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #44

No, you falsely presented her as being pro-TPP, by posting a video with a false headline. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #45

The headline is not false Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #46

The video's headline is false. It implies she supports the TPP. She does not. nt SunSeeker Jul 2016 #47

Her statement was made in the present tense without qualification. Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #48

It was indeed stated in the present tense, IN 2012. BEFORE the terms we now have were set. SunSeeker Jul 2016 #49

Hillary does not oppose TPP. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #3

plz Cryptoad Jun 2016 #7

If Obama doesn't get it through Congress then Hillary will. Mark my words. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #10

No shortage of seers around these here parts........ Cryptoad Jun 2016 #11

I'm not arrogant enough to believe Americans aren't stupid enough to elect Trump. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #15

Poppy did not get NAFTA through Congress. merrily Jul 2016 #28

13 Democratic senators voted to fast-track tpp: elleng Jun 2016 #4

So, Brexit is a good thing? tirebiter Jun 2016 #5

Only those who BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #12

"Sanders and Clinton are right to oppose the TPP"? Android3.14 Jun 2016 #6

the uninformed? Cryptoad Jun 2016 #8

Or the willfully ignorant. Android3.14 Jun 2016 #16

Globalization is not the problem. Low wages, shitty jobs, & wealth inequality are the problems Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #9

Thanks for lots of good BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #13

Gosh darn it, How do I Rec a post? Sentath Jun 2016 #14

Sounds good to me. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #17

Corporate control of the globalization is the problem seabeckind Jul 2016 #22

As I said (in title), wealth inequality is one of the roots. You agree when you ref "oligopoly". nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #23

No, I don't agree. seabeckind Jul 2016 #24

An un-wealthy oligopoly is toothless. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #25

False equivalency. seabeckind Jul 2016 #26

Non-equivalency. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #30

+1 Trying to maximize profits for stockholders is a legal corporate duty. merrily Jul 2016 #29

Yes it is. seabeckind Jul 2016 #31

I know what you are saying, but both CAN exist with proper regulation. merrily Jul 2016 #32