Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
7. Genetically modified Golden Rice falls short on lifesaving promises
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jul 2016
Genetically modified Golden Rice falls short on lifesaving promises
GMO activists not to blame for scientific challenges slowing introduction, study finds

By Gerry Everding June 2, 2016



Heralded on the cover of Time magazine in 2000 as a genetically modified (GMO) crop with the potential to save millions of lives in the Third World, Golden Rice is still years away from field introduction and even then, may fall short of lofty health benefits still cited regularly by GMO advocates, suggests a new study from Washington University in St. Louis.

“Golden Rice is still not ready for the market, but we find little support for the common claim that environmental activists are responsible for stalling its introduction. GMO opponents have not been the problem,” said lead author Glenn Stone, professor of anthropology and environmental studies in Arts & Sciences. (Emphasis added - k)



Golden Rice on Time cover
Proclaimed as a potential life saver 16 years ago on the cover of Time, Golden Rice may still be years away from approval.


...GMO proponents often claim that environmental groups such as Greenpeace should be blamed for slowing the introduction of Golden Rice and thus, prolonging the misery of poor people who suffer from Vitamin A deficiencies.

In a recent article in the journal Agriculture & Human Values, Stone and co-author Dominic Glover, a rice researcher at the Institute for Development Studies at the University of Sussex, find little evidence that anti-GMO activists are to blame for Golden Rice’s unfulfilled promises.


Washington University anthropologist Glenn Stone, shown here with an agricultural field agent, has studied rice cultivation and research in the Philippines since 2013. (Photo: Glenn Stone)


“The rice simply has not been successful in test plots of the rice breeding institutes in the Philippines, where the leading research is being done,” Stone said. “It has not even been submitted for approval to the regulatory agency, the Philippine Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI).”

....

https://source.wustl.edu/2016/06/genetically-modified-golden-rice-falls-short-lifesaving-promises/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GMO foods are unfashionable on the far left comradebillyboy Jul 2016 #1
Amen Scruffy1 Jul 2016 #2
Genetically modified Golden Rice falls short on lifesaving promises kristopher Jul 2016 #7
Even if that is true, it does not exonerate Greenpeace's unethical actions. HuckleB Jul 2016 #23
Hey now. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #3
That organic industry propaganda is not remotely accurate. HuckleB Jul 2016 #4
More. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #5
An Organic industry Gish Gallop does not change reality. HuckleB Jul 2016 #6
That poster is an anti-vaxxer as well. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #10
Hardly, although you said that about me on a thread yesterday and on another the day before that. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #11
You mean your anti-vax post from a TV quack that a jury hid? Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #13
No, I am not "being quite disgusting." It is regrettable that you or anyone might feel that way. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #14
The content of your constant spam posts promoting debunked views is very disgusting. HuckleB Jul 2016 #17
I usually don't look to dentists when I want to talk about autism. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #20
I POST SOLIDLY VETTED INFORMATION ONLY, not opinion. Disregard or explore, as you wish. nt proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #21
No, you don't. HuckleB Jul 2016 #22
No, you do not. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #24
Your history is well known. HuckleB Jul 2016 #15
The Anthropology of Genetically Modified Crops[ kristopher Jul 2016 #8
A cherry picked opinion piece by someone not even in the field is your defense of the indefensible. HuckleB Jul 2016 #16
It's peer reviewed work by a highly regarded anthropologist working on this specific problem. kristopher Jul 2016 #18
Just because it's in a journal, doesn't mean what you think it means. HuckleB Jul 2016 #19
Why do you want to harm the planet? HuckleB Jul 2016 #25
The mouthbreathers are just gonna try to say that the Nobel laureates are Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #9
And that's just what they did. HuckleB Jul 2016 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Judi Lynn Jul 2016 #12
science always gets co-opted for commercial greed.. lostnfound Jul 2016 #26
Pushing anti-GMO fictions is not fine. HuckleB Jul 2016 #27
When I was in 3rd grade, GMOs beat up my friend & stole his lunch money Orrex Jul 2016 #28
GMOs cancelled Firefly. Nt Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #30
Ask yourself why this happens. HuckleB Jul 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nobel Award Winners ask G...»Reply #7