Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
11. Hardly, although you said that about me on a thread yesterday and on another the day before that.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jul 2016

Last edited Sun Jul 3, 2016, 11:59 PM - Edit history (3)

I'm with THEM, basically, among many others I could name:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/03/17/peds.2015-4230

Pediatrics
March 2016, VOLUME 137 / ISSUE 3

Childhood Vaccine Exemption Policy: The Case for a Less Restrictive Alternative
Douglas J. Opel, Matthew P. Kronman, Douglas S. Diekema, Edgar K. Marcuse, Jeffrey S. Duchin, Eric Kodish


Abbreviations: MV — measles vaccine, NME — nonmedical exemption, VPD — vaccine-preventable disease

Efforts to restrict parents’ ability to exempt children from receiving vaccinations required for school entry have recently reached a pinnacle. The American Medical Association voiced support for eliminating nonmedical exemptions (NMEs) from school vaccine requirements,1 and California enacted legislation doing so.2 Although laudable in their objective, policies eliminating NMEs from all vaccines are scientifically and ethically problematic. In the present article, we argue for an exemption policy that eliminates NMEs just for the measles vaccine (MV) and is pursued only after other less restrictive approaches have been implemented and deemed unsuccessful.

Published By American Academy of Pediatrics
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Author Information: Douglas J. Opel, MD, MPHa,b, Matthew P. Kronman, MD, MSCEb, Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPHa,b,c, Edgar K. Marcuse, MD, MPHb, Jeffrey S. Duchin, MDd,e,f, and Eric Kodish, MDg

aTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, and
bDepartments of Pediatrics and
dMedicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;
cDepartments of Health Services and
eEpidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington;
fCommunicable Disease Epidemiology and Immunization Section, Public Health–Seattle and King County, Seattle, Washington; and
gDepartment of Bioethics, Center for Ethics, Humanities and Spiritual Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Dr Opel conceptualized and designed the study and drafted the initial manuscript; and Drs Kronman, Diekema, Marcuse, Duchin, and Kodish reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

OFF-TOPIC, incidentally.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GMO foods are unfashionable on the far left comradebillyboy Jul 2016 #1
Amen Scruffy1 Jul 2016 #2
Genetically modified Golden Rice falls short on lifesaving promises kristopher Jul 2016 #7
Even if that is true, it does not exonerate Greenpeace's unethical actions. HuckleB Jul 2016 #23
Hey now. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #3
That organic industry propaganda is not remotely accurate. HuckleB Jul 2016 #4
More. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #5
An Organic industry Gish Gallop does not change reality. HuckleB Jul 2016 #6
That poster is an anti-vaxxer as well. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #10
Hardly, although you said that about me on a thread yesterday and on another the day before that. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #11
You mean your anti-vax post from a TV quack that a jury hid? Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #13
No, I am not "being quite disgusting." It is regrettable that you or anyone might feel that way. proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #14
The content of your constant spam posts promoting debunked views is very disgusting. HuckleB Jul 2016 #17
I usually don't look to dentists when I want to talk about autism. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #20
I POST SOLIDLY VETTED INFORMATION ONLY, not opinion. Disregard or explore, as you wish. nt proverbialwisdom Jul 2016 #21
No, you don't. HuckleB Jul 2016 #22
No, you do not. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #24
Your history is well known. HuckleB Jul 2016 #15
The Anthropology of Genetically Modified Crops[ kristopher Jul 2016 #8
A cherry picked opinion piece by someone not even in the field is your defense of the indefensible. HuckleB Jul 2016 #16
It's peer reviewed work by a highly regarded anthropologist working on this specific problem. kristopher Jul 2016 #18
Just because it's in a journal, doesn't mean what you think it means. HuckleB Jul 2016 #19
Why do you want to harm the planet? HuckleB Jul 2016 #25
The mouthbreathers are just gonna try to say that the Nobel laureates are Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #9
And that's just what they did. HuckleB Jul 2016 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Judi Lynn Jul 2016 #12
science always gets co-opted for commercial greed.. lostnfound Jul 2016 #26
Pushing anti-GMO fictions is not fine. HuckleB Jul 2016 #27
When I was in 3rd grade, GMOs beat up my friend & stole his lunch money Orrex Jul 2016 #28
GMOs cancelled Firefly. Nt Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2016 #30
Ask yourself why this happens. HuckleB Jul 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nobel Award Winners ask G...»Reply #11