Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: Nobel Award Winners ask Greenpeace to stand on scientific consensus, instead of against it [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)11. Hardly, although you said that about me on a thread yesterday and on another the day before that.
Last edited Sun Jul 3, 2016, 11:59 PM - Edit history (3)
I'm with THEM, basically, among many others I could name:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/03/17/peds.2015-4230
Pediatrics
March 2016, VOLUME 137 / ISSUE 3
Childhood Vaccine Exemption Policy: The Case for a Less Restrictive Alternative
Douglas J. Opel, Matthew P. Kronman, Douglas S. Diekema, Edgar K. Marcuse, Jeffrey S. Duchin, Eric Kodish
Abbreviations: MV measles vaccine, NME nonmedical exemption, VPD vaccine-preventable disease
Efforts to restrict parents ability to exempt children from receiving vaccinations required for school entry have recently reached a pinnacle. The American Medical Association voiced support for eliminating nonmedical exemptions (NMEs) from school vaccine requirements,1 and California enacted legislation doing so.2 Although laudable in their objective, policies eliminating NMEs from all vaccines are scientifically and ethically problematic. In the present article, we argue for an exemption policy that eliminates NMEs just for the measles vaccine (MV) and is pursued only after other less restrictive approaches have been implemented and deemed unsuccessful.
Published By American Academy of Pediatrics
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Author Information: Douglas J. Opel, MD, MPHa,b, Matthew P. Kronman, MD, MSCEb, Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPHa,b,c, Edgar K. Marcuse, MD, MPHb, Jeffrey S. Duchin, MDd,e,f, and Eric Kodish, MDgaTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Childrens Research Institute, and
bDepartments of Pediatrics and
dMedicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;
cDepartments of Health Services and
eEpidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington;
fCommunicable Disease Epidemiology and Immunization Section, Public HealthSeattle and King County, Seattle, Washington; and
gDepartment of Bioethics, Center for Ethics, Humanities and Spiritual Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Dr Opel conceptualized and designed the study and drafted the initial manuscript; and Drs Kronman, Diekema, Marcuse, Duchin, and Kodish reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
OFF-TOPIC, incidentally.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nobel Award Winners ask Greenpeace to stand on scientific consensus, instead of against it [View all]
HuckleB
Jul 2016
OP
Hardly, although you said that about me on a thread yesterday and on another the day before that.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#11
No, I am not "being quite disgusting." It is regrettable that you or anyone might feel that way.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#14
The content of your constant spam posts promoting debunked views is very disgusting.
HuckleB
Jul 2016
#17
I POST SOLIDLY VETTED INFORMATION ONLY, not opinion. Disregard or explore, as you wish. nt
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#21
A cherry picked opinion piece by someone not even in the field is your defense of the indefensible.
HuckleB
Jul 2016
#16
It's peer reviewed work by a highly regarded anthropologist working on this specific problem.
kristopher
Jul 2016
#18
The mouthbreathers are just gonna try to say that the Nobel laureates are
Dr Hobbitstein
Jul 2016
#9