Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
25. Dystopian sci-fi is a reaction to the author's own world.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 05:32 PM
Mar 2012

Jack Booted thuggery existed in Orwell's Europe- including the UK.

Sophisticated methods of brainwashing existed for hundreds---no, make that thousands---of years before Huxley, as did rigid social stratefication. Churches are especially adept, though the military is a close second. The mother's voice, coaxing a child to be an Alpha and not a Beta---even though the child may be a Beta at heart---is the social equivalent of hyponosis, and it is very powerful hyponosis.

The individual's resistance to these two types of tyranny has also been lauded since humans first put pen to paper, stylus to clay tablet and now, finger to keyboard.

There is a precarious balance of individual needs versus social needs in every culture. The result is that in some cultures you can't be gay. In others, you can't be female. In others, you can't get high. In others, you can't cry. All these "can'ts" wear away at the individual's notion of self.

You can only "get the future right" if you predict the technology that will be available for society to enforce its norms upon the individual. And technology is, at least initially, driven by consumer demand and the desire to make profit.

I think "The President's Analyst" got it right, with their dystopian future in which every single one of us is joined at the hip to our phone. But then, it is easier to predict the technology of the near future than of the distant future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Aldous Huxley's Letter to George Orwell [View all] Ichingcarpenter Mar 2012 OP
++Orwell and Huxley were both right - the proles get the boot,the Outer Party have video and soma leveymg Mar 2012 #1
But hypnotism is demonstrable bunk longship Mar 2012 #2
The "hypnotic effect" of staring at moving images on video screens is real & demonstrated by science leveymg Mar 2012 #3
Okay, you're correct longship Mar 2012 #4
I think we agree. The point is that Huxley got it right that people would be doped, distracted, leveymg Mar 2012 #5
I am with you --- 100%. eom longship Mar 2012 #6
++ Good! - NT Newest Reality Mar 2012 #7
++ Thanks! leveymg Mar 2012 #8
I think that we're further away from BNW and 1984 than when they were written muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #14
Smart kings figured out long ago that tolerating (some) public display of dissent creates loyalty leveymg Mar 2012 #24
doubleplusgood The Stranger Mar 2012 #15
Check out, if you haven't, a BBC documentary series called "Century of the Self" deutsey Mar 2012 #22
correct IMO lunasun Mar 2012 #26
I don't know... UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #10
Hmmm longship Mar 2012 #11
I'm very cynical and not one to believe in woo of any kind. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #12
Please don't be cynical longship Mar 2012 #16
Here's one you'll like. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #19
Randi is the real deal longship Mar 2012 #20
He's great. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #21
Even a well known skeptic as Richard Feynman usrname Mar 2012 #23
You would be surprised. zeemike Mar 2012 #27
Find a copy of Marat/Sade somewhere and watch it Recursion Mar 2012 #9
I think this is why psychotropic drugs are illegal such as LSD, Pot , Mescaline... etc Ichingcarpenter Mar 2012 #13
the onion boiled it down to humans looking at rectangles. pansypoo53219 Mar 2012 #17
The fnords! The fnords! I can see the fnords! malthaussen Mar 2012 #18
Dystopian sci-fi is a reaction to the author's own world. McCamy Taylor Mar 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Aldous Huxley's Letter to...»Reply #25