Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
6. i'm thinking if I were a senior member of the Democratic party..
Mon May 29, 2017, 07:17 PM
May 2017

I would find a way to address the anxieties - and speak plainly about it, reminding voters of what has been done to divide us, what fuels rank partisanship to such a degree reason and logic go out of the window. To do so would mean acknowledging that yes we have a problem and calling it out for the ugliness that it is and challenging all of us to do better, to see each other as part of a community, and as a politician, I would demonstrate and show, through action, grit and determination to make the system work better.

At the core of it is values. Trump attacked *values* last year. So we stand up for women's rights and environmental health, but also justice and the importance of valuing the contributions we all make regardless of ethnicity. This is what Democrats have to hone in on, and especially reject attempts to call it "identity politics".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Go Joe mainstreetonce May 2017 #1
We can choose to ignore the empirical data if we want to... JHan May 2017 #2
Not excused or smoothed over, elleng May 2017 #3
But elleng there's already an acknowledgement we have to do better to reach out... JHan May 2017 #4
I HOPE there's an acknowledgment we have to do better reach out, elleng May 2017 #5
i'm thinking if I were a senior member of the Democratic party.. JHan May 2017 #6
So do I hope senior party members would do so, elleng May 2017 #7
And many of the "conclusions" in that article are based on selective statistics, not the entire... George II May 2017 #15
Exactly... JHan May 2017 #16
I think that the Democratic Party is going to have to part ways with it's Deplorables. Mars and Minerva May 2017 #8
While on some points Biden is right, his implication that a good number of these trump still_one May 2017 #9
The losses in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin elleng May 2017 #10
You are missing my point. It wasn't because of those who voted for trump., it was because of those still_one May 2017 #11
There were a few reasons, elleng May 2017 #12
sure we can agree on that. I also subscribe to the Howard Dean 50 state strategy, that one size still_one May 2017 #13
ABSOLUTELY, Dean's 50 state strategy! elleng May 2017 #14
I assume you are referring to Rahm Emanuel, and the period where he did have a lot of still_one May 2017 #17
No, that is not true. The total loss in those three states combined was a mere 77,000 votes. George II May 2017 #18
The # of votes is not important, elleng May 2017 #19
I know electoral votes are important, but they're determined by # of votes aren't they? George II May 2017 #20
Really? Clinton didn't campaign in Pennsylvania? That is absolutely not what I remember. StevieM May 2017 #21
neither will work if it just appears to be pandering not backed by a candidates record. yurbud May 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»JOE BIDENS SOUND ADVICE F...»Reply #6