Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,732 posts)
3. If they want to limit payouts they need to lobby for universal single payer health insurance
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 07:15 PM
Mar 2012

because that is the one thing that will limit the payouts in most liability cases. Pain and suffering awards will be negligible compared to the lifetime of expensive care needed for severe damage to someone's health.

I live in Liebeck's town. Her injuries were horrific and that McDonald's had numerous complaints. However, the appeals court worked the way it was supposed to and the jury's award was deemed excessive. Mrs. Liebeck got payment for her medical care, what she had originally asked for, not anything extra.

Most high profile multimillion dollar damage awards are reduced on appeal, that's the way the system works. All "tort deform" does is abolish the right of the people to appeal to the government for redress of grievances, which is what the civil courts really are.

It's just another attack on the Bill of Rights by the party of the rich and powerful.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Who Really Gets Burned Wi...»Reply #3