Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

shanny

(6,709 posts)

6. No thanks.

Reply to marylandblue (Reply #5)

Sat Dec 30, 2017, 10:00 PM

Dec 2017

The title--and the first sentence--gives away the game. fwiw, the "far left" seems to consist of "anybody further left than me."

If you have links to actual civil rights lawyers and similar, I'd be happy to read them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does amicus brief from former intel chiefs risk justifying stifling of dissent? [View all] summer_in_TX Dec 2017 OP

I cannot comment on the substance of this, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2017 #1

I read the brief and don't see a problem with it marylandblue Dec 2017 #2

Examples? shanny Dec 2017 #3

See this article marylandblue Dec 2017 #5

No thanks. shanny Dec 2017 #6

I thought you meant examples of Russian manipulation of the far left marylandblue Dec 2017 #7

Even if not written in legalese, the brief could have important consequences shanny Dec 2017 #8

This is the problem. Igel Dec 2017 #4