Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)

7. I thought you meant examples of Russian manipulation of the far left

Reply to shanny (Reply #6)

Sat Dec 30, 2017, 10:03 PM

Dec 2017

Such as what I said about The Nation, and the many discussions on DU about Jill Stein. But if you are concerned about the amicus brief, just read it, it's only six pages long and it isn't written in legalese.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does amicus brief from former intel chiefs risk justifying stifling of dissent? [View all] summer_in_TX Dec 2017 OP

I cannot comment on the substance of this, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2017 #1

I read the brief and don't see a problem with it marylandblue Dec 2017 #2

Examples? shanny Dec 2017 #3

See this article marylandblue Dec 2017 #5

No thanks. shanny Dec 2017 #6

I thought you meant examples of Russian manipulation of the far left marylandblue Dec 2017 #7

Even if not written in legalese, the brief could have important consequences shanny Dec 2017 #8

This is the problem. Igel Dec 2017 #4