Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

shanny

(6,709 posts)

8. Even if not written in legalese, the brief could have important consequences

Reply to marylandblue (Reply #7)

Sat Dec 30, 2017, 10:11 PM

Dec 2017

not obvious to someone unversed in civil rights law. Which is what I thought the OP was concerned about, and what concerned me. Since apparently you weren't, my apologies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does amicus brief from former intel chiefs risk justifying stifling of dissent? [View all] summer_in_TX Dec 2017 OP

I cannot comment on the substance of this, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2017 #1

I read the brief and don't see a problem with it marylandblue Dec 2017 #2

Examples? shanny Dec 2017 #3

See this article marylandblue Dec 2017 #5

No thanks. shanny Dec 2017 #6

I thought you meant examples of Russian manipulation of the far left marylandblue Dec 2017 #7

Even if not written in legalese, the brief could have important consequences shanny Dec 2017 #8

This is the problem. Igel Dec 2017 #4