Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. This must be a satirical piece
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:04 PM
Mar 2012
But if Scalia remains faithful to his analysis in Raich, <yada yada yada...>

Scalia is well-known for his ad-hoc decisions. He said re: bush v. Gore, "Yes, I am overturning the will of the people, but my decision in this case is only for this case - no precedent should be taken from it"

So if these authors expect his ruling in this case to somehow be based on his past rulings, they're sadly mistaken.

Edit: If you want a clue as to how Fat Tony and Slappy will vote on this one, a better indicator than their past rulings would be who they've been getting bribes from recently. Check their recent purchases, hunting trips, speaking fees, and so on. they are so corrupt they don't even bother to hide their graft.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»"Obamacare" wil...»Reply #3