Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

(791 posts)

5. This is what I would of thought

Tue Aug 14, 2018, 04:01 PM

Aug 2018

Thanks!
I just wasn't sure if maybe it is a quirk of the US legal system or constitution.
This is not my strong point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's use of NDAs with his staff breaks with precedent of past administrations [View all] Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2018 OP

They're obviously conflating... yallerdawg Aug 2018 #2

I'm surprised you can have a binding NDA Thyla Aug 2018 #3

Contracts requiring illegal action are automatically invalid. lagomorph777 Aug 2018 #4

This is what I would of thought Thyla Aug 2018 #5

I'm no lawyer either, but that's what I've heard. lagomorph777 Aug 2018 #6

The full article at the link gets into that somewhat. Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2018 #7