Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

spooky3

(38,911 posts)

3. It's good to see a legal expert confirm what a lot of

Reply to PSPS (Original post)

Thu Aug 16, 2018, 11:48 PM

Aug 2018

non-lawyers thought was inappropriate. It’s too bad the jury will not be allowed to read this opinion piece. Maybe one or more of the jurors is a lawyer and can help the others.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The extraordinary bias of the judge in the Manafort trial [View all] PSPS Aug 2018 OP

the jury should have been sequestered from the judge RealNewzFakePrez Aug 2018 #1

One must wonder if the Judge has been to Russia. nt DURHAM D Aug 2018 #2

#NRAROUBLES? lagomorph777 Aug 2018 #7

Paranoia runs deep.... SCantiGOP Aug 2018 #10

It's good to see a legal expert confirm what a lot of spooky3 Aug 2018 #3

It was obvious he was biased from the first day. BigmanPigman Aug 2018 #4

No such thing as a bad judge? czarjak Aug 2018 #5

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #6

Quack judge. Nitram Aug 2018 #8

Can the prosecution have a mistrial declared on the basis of the judge's behavior? Nitram Aug 2018 #9