Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mike_c

(37,127 posts)
1. not so....
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 08:47 PM
Mar 2012

The issue is that everyone is being forced to make health insurance companies profitable. There are lots of countries that require citizens to carry health insurance but every one that I'm aware of either makes it unlawful to profit from that insurance OR they provide low cost public alternatives.

I am implacably opposed to for-profit health insurance. As you say, any prudent person who possibly can carries health insurance *in this country with it's regressive health care delivery system*-- in my case it's provided by my employer-- but I despise it and would LOVE to see my insurance company bankrupt, it's executives begging on the street (or doing productive labor somewhere instead), and it's assets seized to pay it's debts. I'm sick of the goddamned greed that EVERYTHING seems to revolve around in this country. It's time to get profit out of health care, and most especially to boot the middle men who serve no function other than siphoning off a large proportion of health care costs as personal profit made on the backs of the sick and injured.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

not so.... mike_c Mar 2012 #1
I was very pissed off when the Public option was thrown overboard. Bill USA Mar 2012 #2
do not dismay, when the supremes strike down the ACA, single payer will be not far away. Bill USA Mar 2012 #4
+ 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #5
actually I am talking about the law that is being reviewed by the court. you are taking a step back Bill USA Mar 2012 #7
Are you claiming that people in the US do not die because they lack access to health care? Fumesucker Mar 2012 #8
Yes, yes and yes sad sally Mar 2012 #13
SCOTUS + Scalia = The Obama Administration now? Back the truck up. freshwest Mar 2012 #3
Exquisite analysis. Elegant reasoning. I can only say, "I WISH I HAD THOUGHT OF THAT!" JohnWxy Mar 2012 #6
Is it your position that no one in the US dies due to a lack of access to health care? n/t Fumesucker Mar 2012 #9
Earth to Fumesucker - YOu might consider the possibility that you are smoking that 'stuff' too much. JohnWxy Mar 2012 #10
The handle is due to my economic situation, sucking fumes, running on empty.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #16
It's really annoying the way ACA defenders continually collapse insurance with care. EFerrari Mar 2012 #11
what's more annoying is how many DUers can't stay within the scope of a thread. If you want to start Bill USA Mar 2012 #14
Try reading your own thread. nt EFerrari Mar 2012 #15
charity hospitals greymattermom Mar 2012 #12
empty wallet string Nov 2012 #17
people of modest means R subsidized. If things are that tough, sounds like you could get medicaid. Bill USA Nov 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nobody is being FORCED to...»Reply #1