Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
12. When you edit out content and change the title - that is commenting in and of itself
Thu Oct 11, 2018, 07:29 AM
Oct 2018

I take it you are not going to answer my question about what you think the significance of negotiating bulk pricing is, or what opinion you have that this paragraph supports.

I do question if you understand the point of the blog post, even in it's highly edited version on the website of a group that throws up some major red flags in terms of it's credibility on its conclusions.

The blog post does not give any new support to Sander's bill, if that's what you think.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I truly hope Timmygoat Oct 2018 #1
I heard that! Trump and his creepy alert system freaks me out too. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #2
"SinglePayer is proven to slow spending growth without compromising care." George II Oct 2018 #3
Its in the body of the article. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #4
So what do you think the implications are of the Health Affairs *original* article? ehrnst Oct 2018 #5
No comments are indicating any excerpts mashed up. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #6
I have no idea what that sentence means. ehrnst Oct 2018 #7
No, you're not clear what your intent is here. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #8
When you post an edited version of an edited version of a post ehrnst Oct 2018 #9
My title excerpt was not a misunderstanding of the content. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #10
When you edit out content and change the title - that is commenting in and of itself ehrnst Oct 2018 #12
You do understand my edits, which are obvious, not subtle by design, are BeckyDem Oct 2018 #13
I'm not talking about where you put the OP ehrnst Oct 2018 #14
You have slandered PNHP suggesting they were mispresenting O'Shea. They have not BeckyDem Oct 2018 #15
No, that's a strawman. I pointed out that they did not ehrnst Oct 2018 #17
You don't ask hard questions but please, continue to stroke your own ego. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #18
And now an ad hominem attack. ehrnst Oct 2018 #19
Amazing that you imagine O'Shea has ever been misrepresented by PNHP. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #11
Here is something for you to ponder... ehrnst Oct 2018 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Role of regulation in val...»Reply #12