Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,670 posts)
5. The websites don't actually track infections.
Sat May 23, 2020, 07:26 PM
May 2020

They track positive tests.

One woman's story was posted here yesterday, she'd suffered from COVID for 50 days and had had 8 COVID tests.

There you go--8 different "infections" if that's what the websites monitor. But still just one person.

You measure what you want to know about.

The COVID test numbers ... they just tell you the number of positive tests. Not the prevalence in society (which is a standard error) unless you have a large number of tests compared to the number of infections (and no preference for testing just the symptomatic). Divide that by the total number of tests and you get an upperbound for the current infection rate in the areas you're testing.

Positive test # and the # positive antibody tests tell you how far along in a lower-bound sort of way you are to having most of the population infected.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»C.D.C. Test Counting Erro...»Reply #5