Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,581 posts)
19. You know, a perspective on aerosol transmission was published in Science recently.
Sun Jul 5, 2020, 11:42 AM
Jul 2020

I discussed it in the Science forum on this website: Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2

The perspective therein to the article in one of the world's most prestigious science journals is here: Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (Kimberly A. Prather1, Chia C. Wang2,3, Robert T. Schooley4 Science 26 Jun 2020: Vol. 368, Issue 6498, pp. 1422-1424)

There are almost certainly tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of scientists who work for the World Health Organization. It is highly improbable that every scientist reading this perspective article ignored it.

Here's how science interfaces with policy intelligently, which obviously excludes policy in the US where policy is prevented from intelligent interaction with science: Many scientists publish papers, and high level scientists in an intelligently run policy organization - placed in that position by demonstration of competence - review the literature carefully.

This means that a few papers published by a subset of scientists, irrespective of their quality - which may be high - are not sufficient to immediately change policy, because decisions that may impact millions or even billions of people require careful consideration lest they do more harm that good, do not take place instanteously.

It takes some hubris I think for any scientist, or even a small group of scientists, to claim that all of the scientists in an international organization are ignoring their considerations. By what qualifications do any scientists claim that all scientists are ignoring any topic?

The perspective certainly raises questions, which is why I took the time to post it. However it is not immediately worthy of vast policy changes.

The most likely case is that the journalist publishing this news headline is clueless, and are putting words in the mouths of the scientists or taking them out of context.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Makes sense but why is WHO ignoring it? soothsayer Jul 2020 #1
Perhaps they actually think only two pathways are significant, appalachiablue Jul 2020 #3
Yeah that latter bit soothsayer Jul 2020 #4
I would be leery of air recirculating with HVAC systems... Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #5
You know, a perspective on aerosol transmission was published in Science recently. NNadir Jul 2020 #19
I've read papers from several epidemiologists... Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #2
Yes, right. Isn't that one of the reasons for social distancing... brush Jul 2020 #7
Quite the contrary. Igel Jul 2020 #8
It was clear that asymptomatic people could spread it long before April. Chemisse Jul 2020 #6
Yes and no. Igel Jul 2020 #9
Do real N95 masks catch stop type of type spread or not? BigmanPigman Jul 2020 #10
They work better at blocking aerosols than droplets... Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #11
THANK YOU!!! BigmanPigman Jul 2020 #12
Are her N95 masks uncomfortable or something? Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #13
I don't know what her problem is... BigmanPigman Jul 2020 #15
I plan to keep using mine until it's difficult... Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #16
That's what I do too. BigmanPigman Jul 2020 #17
+1 CountAllVotes Jul 2020 #25
This is great! n/t Chemisse Jul 2020 #14
Great video on the N95 mask. Thanks for sharing! Nitram Jul 2020 #20
Great info. CountAllVotes Jul 2020 #24
You can, but it might require some digging around the internet. Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2020 #26
Whenever I read a headline from a journalist that begins with the words "Scientists say..." NNadir Jul 2020 #18
Why not contact the writer, and/or appalachiablue Jul 2020 #21
I could write letters like that all day to newspapers and websites... NNadir Jul 2020 #22
Much of US news unfortunately went over to the commercial appalachiablue Jul 2020 #23
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»"Scientists Say WHO Ignor...»Reply #19