Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: I can't live on $709 a month: Americans on social security push for its expansion [View all]RVN VET71
(3,216 posts)37. FYI, the so called "Full Retirement Age" for Social Security is now between 66 and 67
It used to be 65, but that was changed in the 80s.
Signing up at your FRA pays you your full benefit. Signing up earlier and that benefit is reduced by about 5% for each year under your Full Retirement Age.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can't live on $709 a month: Americans on social security push for its expansion [View all]
jmbar2
Jul 2021
OP
Pensions were never universal. Never. At best, maybe 40% of workers were covered by them.
PoindexterOglethorpe
Jul 2021
#46
If $15 is needed for minimum wage, shouldn't SS benefits match that sum? . . .
Journeyman
Jul 2021
#18
When one spouse becomes deceased that SS payment should continue just as if s/he
in2herbs
Jul 2021
#21
The payroll tax didn't need to be raised. The income cap on the payroll tax needs to be eliminated.
Sibelius Fan
Jul 2021
#58
I live in one of 14 states that your SS gets "offset" if you can draw a state retirement. It is a
Evolve Dammit
Jul 2021
#32
FYI, the so called "Full Retirement Age" for Social Security is now between 66 and 67
RVN VET71
Jul 2021
#37