Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,541 posts)
4. Some strange assumptions.
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 03:42 PM
Jun 2012

Heavy into correlation.

And it assumes that only social inequality (which must be equivalent to economic equality) produces the kind of stress that leads to bad diets.

Don't know about that. A friend worked for a couple of executives as a nanny. Her income was low; she had less stress than her bosses, each of which made in the high 6 digits. They left the house every day by 6:30 to commute an hour to NYC with time for accidents. They'd work until 6 or 7 pm. They faced competition at work from subordinates; pressure from above to perform even better; and their companies were also in cutthroat competition with other firms.

Often they had to work weekends. And their reward for their nice high-powered jobs in the City, their nice cars, their annual bonuses that are 10x or more my annual salary, and having a house in a very exclusive old-wealth neighborhood was to watch their little kids cry when they wanted to take her to the park and leave behind their nanny--who woke them in the morning, fed them, played with them, nursed them when they were sick, took them out, etc.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Behind Super-Sized Sodas,...»Reply #4