Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NullTuples

(6,017 posts)
21. I certainly hope you are the only one.
Sun Jan 9, 2022, 03:08 AM
Jan 2022

Perhaps part of the problem is not realizing that humanity is incredibly diverse, and that is a very good thing. And while you might decide that attributes x, y, and z define perfection, if you were to eliminate all other traits from our genome we may not be able to rapidly diversify the next time our environment drastically changes.

What if the ability to easily store fat becomes more important as food supplies dwindle? Sure, obesity is deemed a fault when food is readily available and people who find it easy to remain what is defined as healthily thin are deemed more desirable, but what if that situation was flipped on it's head?

Similar arguments have been made for skin color, certain neurodiversities such as autistics or ADHD, and so on. Even things like being smaller or shorter than average can be a trait that is deemed "less than" in one environments yet provides a survival edge in a different one (see: resource limited islands).

Do you ever stop to think *why* we've been taught to think not conforming to a standard of perfection is somehow morally or practically "wrong"?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GOOD LAWD Skittles Jan 2022 #1
Looking forward to the incoming director, new & improved.. appalachiablue Jan 2022 #2
I've heard that sentiment, usually from repukes Skittles Jan 2022 #3
Very GOP, elite, Ayn Rand Libertarian eugenicist, appalachiablue Jan 2022 #4
Dan Patrick, Texas Lt. Governor, suggested old people should just volunteer to die so the economy tblue37 Jan 2022 #42
he is one fine nazi Skittles Jan 2022 #43
Exactly. BeckyDem Jan 2022 #30
This is an unwise spin. Over 1/2 of Americans have a chronic condition, over 1/4 have multiple. RockRaven Jan 2022 #5
Which is precisely the problem. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2022 #12
I certainly hope you are the only one. NullTuples Jan 2022 #21
I am not talking about a mythical standard of perfection. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2022 #33
You: "This is not fat-shaming. It's stating a fact." NullTuples Jan 2022 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author tblue37 Jan 2022 #44
Walensky has been an unmitigated disaster through this entire ordeal. littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #6
Her original acceptance speech was a real turnoff. Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #9
Oh, I missed that. Do you have any idea how I can find it? littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #25
Perhaps you can google it. Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #34
I'm in the long line with you on that one CentralMass Jan 2022 #23
SHEESH Faux pas Jan 2022 #7
...but this really is the truth YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #8
The previous administration created a deadly situation by promoting the very essence of eugenics. 58Sunliner Jan 2022 #13
Exactly!!!!!!!!! Jon King Jan 2022 #15
That's the first thing I thought of when I read the post. BigmanPigman Jan 2022 #17
Just awful. 58Sunliner Jan 2022 #10
This has been the case all along. They're trying to sacrifice my husband. onecaliberal Jan 2022 #11
+1 BeckyDem Jan 2022 #28
She did not say anyything wrong at all. Jon King Jan 2022 #14
I workout 5 days a week. herding cats Jan 2022 #19
+2 appalachiablue Jan 2022 #32
Pregnant women also expendable? Nululu Jan 2022 #16
Dear God orangecrush Jan 2022 #18
I'm fucking mortified by some of the comments here. chowder66 Jan 2022 #20
++ CentralMass Jan 2022 #24
The same, what I instantly thought. Dont the appalachiablue Jan 2022 #31
👆🏻👆🏻 onecaliberal Jan 2022 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Jan 2022 #38
The absolute base-thinking here blows my mind. chowder66 Jan 2022 #46
Here's the list of comorbidities she's speaking of here. herding cats Jan 2022 #22
The point is not everything you list have equal weight in having adverse effects from COVID YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #40
I didn't list them, the CDC did and with their own qualifiers. herding cats Jan 2022 #45
I did not hear her say anyone was expendable tirebiter Jan 2022 #26
Think about it. Her wording could not be anymore important, agreed? BeckyDem Jan 2022 #29
Exactly YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #41
This is beyond worrisome. BeckyDem Jan 2022 #27
"If they have other problems, that's what it really affects. That's it." dalton99a Jan 2022 #36
That's it, tx. The old, useless eaters need to go! appalachiablue Jan 2022 #37
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»'Encouraging? (Eugenics) ...»Reply #21