Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
23. I know I'll be accused of kicking someone when their down but NAFTA lowered avg wage a whole 0.2%
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jun 2012

the Economic Policy Institute estimated the net job loss due to NAFTA was 682,900 (that's taking into account the jobs gained to meet increased exports due to NAFTA).

go to http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/12statab/labor.pdf and look at Table 586 - Civilian Population - Employment Status 1970 - 2010. to get number of people employed. I used 139,064,000 from 2010.

go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States to get annual income for the 50th percentile for 2000 & 2003. average those to get a figure for average annual income to represent the period 1994 - 2010. That figure is $51,410. This comes to an hourly rate of $24.72 (using 2,080 paid hours per yr).



[font color="white"].....[/font]assume a very high hourly rate of $35 for jobs lost due to NAFTA....

[font color="white"]....[/font]Jobs lost due to NAFTA: 682,900[font color="white"]....[/font] $35.00[font color="white"]....[/font] $23,901,500

[font color="white"]..........................................................................[/font] total
[font color="white"]..........................................................................[/font] employed[font color="white"].................[/font]weighted hrly wage

[font color="white"]....[/font]average hrly wage w/o jobs lost to NAFTA:[font color="white"]......[/font] 139,064,000 [font color="white"]....[/font] $24.72[font color="white"]....[/font] $3,437,153,962
[font color="white"]....[/font] add back jobs lost to NAFTA:[font color="white"]....[/font] [font color="white"]..........................[/font] 682,900[font color="white"]......[/font]$35.00 [font color="white"]........[/font] $23,901,500
[font color="white"].....[/font]average hrly wage with lost jobs added back:[font color="white"]..[/font] 139,746,900 [font color="white"]...[/font] $24.77 [font color="white"]....[/font] $3,461,055,462

The avg hourly wage if the jobs lost to NAFTA had NOT been lost is: $24.77 . THe avg hourly wage with jobs lost to NAFTA is $24.72.

[font color="white"]....[/font]compute % reduction in avg hrly wage:[font color="white"].....[/font] $24.72 / $24.77 - 1 =[font color="white"]...[/font] -0.20%

If you look at average annual income of $51,410 (for 1994 - 2009) that .2% reduction would amount to $104, lowering the annual income to $51,306. That amounts to about $8.69 less pay per month. This change would have a minuscule impact on demand. Certainly, not enough to demand the attention of the Fed.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why the Economy can't get out of First Gear? pipoman Jun 2012 #1
What about his thesis that not enough money is getting into the hands of enough people but instead Bill USA Jun 2012 #2
Yeah, thanks to him.. pipoman Jun 2012 #6
that's right he was pushing for foreign trade deals as sec of labor. and these trade deals are Bill USA Jun 2012 #7
Yep, sure did.. pipoman Jun 2012 #9
Reich was responsible for Alan "Mr. Magoo" Greenspan's opposition to regulating mortgage lenders. Bill USA Jun 2012 #13
Worker Displacement rates were lower during the 90's than in the 80's. see CRS report Bill USA Jun 2012 #8
When was he a corporate sell out? When he supported the wage-lowering, jobs-killing NAFTA? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #3
Yep pipoman Jun 2012 #5
and this is what caused the housing bubble? 2 wars financed on debt & deregulation did not produce Bill USA Jun 2012 #11
The fault of the "housing bubble" pipoman Jun 2012 #16
and this is what caused the housing bubble? 2 wars financed on debt and deregulation did not produce Bill USA Jun 2012 #10
Excuse me, but I don't understand your logic. Are you saying that "Reich did not throw blue collar AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #12
then you don't understand logic at all. Bill USA Jun 2012 #14
Oh, you've shown me the error of my ways. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #15
the point of this thread is why is the recovery going as slow as it is. I quoted Reich who said: Bill USA Jun 2012 #18
Nope. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #19
I didn't think you would. Bill USA Jun 2012 #20
I know I'll be accused of kicking someone when their down but NAFTA lowered avg wage a whole 0.2% Bill USA Jun 2012 #23
The other big problem is that the housing market is not yet back. That is a MUST. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #4
I'm glad to see some defense of Reich. philly_bob Jun 2012 #17
Exactly. People make mistakes, Reich is willing to admit his mistakes and move on. Sirveri Jun 2012 #21
I'll tell you the answer in one tiny word: Zoeisright Jun 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why the Economy can't get...»Reply #23