Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

bemildred

(90,061 posts)

6. There was never any question that there is enough to fry us all.

Reply to MindMover (Original post)

Mon Jul 9, 2012, 09:18 AM

Jul 2012

He seems to be saying that there was an argument that we would be saved from global warming by peak oil, which is a new one to me. I must admit it's a dumb enough argument that the anti-climate-change crowd might find it attractive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We were wrong on peak oil. There's enough to fry us all [View all] MindMover Jul 2012 OP

Ice caps melting = new possibilities! "Let's Go!" NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #1

Energy sanity is desperately needed.... MindMover Jul 2012 #2

The willful ignorance of economists, politicians, and even scientists around this matter... NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #3

It's now cost effective to boil oil out of rocks! Let's go! yurbud Jul 2012 #12

Unless Ghawar starts to decline pscot Jul 2012 #4

Sanity econmagic Jul 2012 #5

There was never any question that there is enough to fry us all. bemildred Jul 2012 #6

I'm going to guess that the author of this piece IDemo Jul 2012 #7

There are a lot more than just one of those fields ... MindMover Jul 2012 #8

Just one of those fields? IDemo Jul 2012 #9

What part of peak oil was wrong? PO Pops Jul 2012 #10

Peak was always about the fields and the end of cheap oil. Sirveri Jul 2012 #11