Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. Of course Barclays could not have manipulated those rates by themselves
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 08:14 AM
Jul 2012

For example :16 banks set Libor daily for the £ - its the rate that each is prepared to pay the others to lend to cover cash shortfalls against cash surpluses. The top and bottom 4 figures are excluded and then an average is taken of the remaining 8. Similar occurs for other currencies.

Anyone who needs to ask the question why banks would borrow from each probably wouldn't understand the answer although searching might help them.

Other than when Barclays constantly bid high, and as such were constantly excluded , most references to the subject concern artificial lowering of the rate to support individual banks own balance sheets at the expense of profits. Fraud was involved in this mainly when traders knew in advance , with the complicity of others , whether the rate was likely to move up or down.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Market Has Spoken, an...»Reply #2