Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Laurence Tribe -- Why I Changed My Mind on the Debt Limit [View all]
Last edited Sun May 7, 2023, 12:09 PM - Edit history (1)
...The right question is whether Congress after passing the spending bills that created these debts in the first place can invoke an arbitrary dollar limit to force the president and his administration to do its bidding...
There is only one right answer to that question, and it is no.
And there is only one person with the power to give Congress that answer: the president of the United States. As a practical matter, what that means is this: Mr. Biden must tell Congress in no uncertain terms and as soon as possible, before its too late to avert a financial crisis that the United States will pay all its bills as they come due, even if the Treasury Department must borrow more than Congress has said it can.
The president should remind Congress and the nation, Im bound by my oath to preserve and protect the Constitution to prevent the country from defaulting on its debts for the first time in our entire history. Above all, the president should say with clarity, My duty faithfully to execute the laws extends to all the spending laws Congress has enacted, laws that bind whoever sits in this office laws that Congress enacted without worrying about the statute capping the amount we can borrow.
By taking that position, the president would not be usurping Congresss lawmaking power or its power of the purse. Nor would he be usurping the Supreme Courts power to say what the law is, as Chief Justice John Marshall once put it. Mr. Biden would simply be doing his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed even if doing so leaves one law the borrowing limit first enacted in 1917 temporarily on the cutting room floor.
Ignoring one law in order to uphold every other has compelling historical precedent. Its precisely what Abraham Lincoln did when he briefly overrode the habeas corpus law in 1861 to save the Union, later saying to Congress, Are all the laws, but one, to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces, lest that one be violated?....
There is only one right answer to that question, and it is no.
And there is only one person with the power to give Congress that answer: the president of the United States. As a practical matter, what that means is this: Mr. Biden must tell Congress in no uncertain terms and as soon as possible, before its too late to avert a financial crisis that the United States will pay all its bills as they come due, even if the Treasury Department must borrow more than Congress has said it can.
The president should remind Congress and the nation, Im bound by my oath to preserve and protect the Constitution to prevent the country from defaulting on its debts for the first time in our entire history. Above all, the president should say with clarity, My duty faithfully to execute the laws extends to all the spending laws Congress has enacted, laws that bind whoever sits in this office laws that Congress enacted without worrying about the statute capping the amount we can borrow.
By taking that position, the president would not be usurping Congresss lawmaking power or its power of the purse. Nor would he be usurping the Supreme Courts power to say what the law is, as Chief Justice John Marshall once put it. Mr. Biden would simply be doing his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed even if doing so leaves one law the borrowing limit first enacted in 1917 temporarily on the cutting room floor.
Ignoring one law in order to uphold every other has compelling historical precedent. Its precisely what Abraham Lincoln did when he briefly overrode the habeas corpus law in 1861 to save the Union, later saying to Congress, Are all the laws, but one, to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces, lest that one be violated?....
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/opinion/debt-limit.html

31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Excuse me? Your budget & debt, unlike America's, isn't covered by the 14th Amendment.
ancianita
May 2023
#3
Lincoln ignored SCOTUS when it interfered with his oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
paleotn
May 2023
#5
Yep. Thanks for the restaurant example which even everyday trumpcult could understand.
ancianita
May 2023
#9
Nah. SCOTUS couldn't possibly ignore the explicit constitutional bottom line language re this.
ancianita
May 2023
#10
Exactly. Congress passed a budget and it was signed into law. They will also have that opportunity.
bullimiami
May 2023
#11
So if he changed his mind, it sounds like Tribe had the opposite opinion previously.
MichMan
May 2023
#17
I also wondered about that phrase "changed his mind" without clarification in the OP
erronis
May 2023
#18
Exactly. And if you have to contemplate that for more than a second, you don't know what TFG or
ffr
May 2023
#21
Don't be surprised if we see Biden do exactly this in an Address to the Nation...
Joinfortmill
May 2023
#24
Right. Biden knows exactly what to do, and will have the national audience's support.
ancianita
May 2023
#25
The 14th Amendment allows the President to take lawful actions to prevent default on our debt
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2023
#26