Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ancianita

(43,334 posts)
Sun May 7, 2023, 09:07 AM May 2023

Laurence Tribe -- Why I Changed My Mind on the Debt Limit [View all]

Last edited Sun May 7, 2023, 12:09 PM - Edit history (1)

...The right question is whether Congress — after passing the spending bills that created these debts in the first place — can invoke an arbitrary dollar limit to force the president and his administration to do its bidding...

There is only one right answer to that question, and it is no.

And there is only one person with the power to give Congress that answer: the president of the United States. As a practical matter, what that means is this: Mr. Biden must tell Congress in no uncertain terms — and as soon as possible, before it’s too late to avert a financial crisis — that the United States will pay all its bills as they come due, even if the Treasury Department must borrow more than Congress has said it can.

The president should remind Congress and the nation, “I’m bound by my oath to preserve and protect the Constitution to prevent the country from defaulting on its debts for the first time in our entire history.” Above all, the president should say with clarity, “My duty faithfully to execute the laws extends to all the spending laws Congress has enacted, laws that bind whoever sits in this office — laws that Congress enacted without worrying about the statute capping the amount we can borrow.”

By taking that position, the president would not be usurping Congress’s lawmaking power or its power of the purse. Nor would he be usurping the Supreme Court’s power to “say what the law is,” as Chief Justice John Marshall once put it. Mr. Biden would simply be doing his duty to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” even if doing so leaves one law — the borrowing limit first enacted in 1917 — temporarily on the cutting room floor.

Ignoring one law in order to uphold every other has compelling historical precedent. It’s precisely what Abraham Lincoln did when he briefly overrode the habeas corpus law in 1861 to save the Union, later saying to Congress, “Are all the laws, but one, to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces, lest that one be violated?”....


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/opinion/debt-limit.html

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence Tribe. Another "national treasure" n/t Ms7wo7rees 7wo7rees May 2023 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author brewens May 2023 #2
Excuse me? Your budget & debt, unlike America's, isn't covered by the 14th Amendment. ancianita May 2023 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author brewens May 2023 #4
Lincoln ignored SCOTUS when it interfered with his oath to defend and protect the Constitution. paleotn May 2023 #5
Yes. Thanks for clarifying the parallel. ancianita May 2023 #6
Agreed....it's about paying bills you already incurred. anciano May 2023 #7
Yep. Thanks for the restaurant example which even everyday trumpcult could understand. ancianita May 2023 #9
I agree, but if SCOTUS does not, Biden must be willing to ignore them Fiendish Thingy May 2023 #8
Nah. SCOTUS couldn't possibly ignore the explicit constitutional bottom line language re this. ancianita May 2023 #10
Did you mean unconstitutional? Fiendish Thingy May 2023 #12
No. But I'll give your reasoning more thought, thanks. ancianita May 2023 #13
Yes, we agree Fiendish Thingy May 2023 #14
Okay. So, ancianita May 2023 #15
You misunderstand me Fiendish Thingy May 2023 #19
Okay, now I understand that you meant that. Thanks. ancianita May 2023 #22
Exactly. Congress passed a budget and it was signed into law. They will also have that opportunity. bullimiami May 2023 #11
Joe will do the right thing. usonian May 2023 #16
So if he changed his mind, it sounds like Tribe had the opposite opinion previously. MichMan May 2023 #17
I also wondered about that phrase "changed his mind" without clarification in the OP erronis May 2023 #18
Thank you for posting this LetMyPeopleVote May 2023 #27
My take is that it's a title that would draw a pro-Republican audience. ancianita May 2023 #23
Since SCOTUS is so willing to violate common decency for money Farmer-Rick May 2023 #20
Exactly. And if you have to contemplate that for more than a second, you don't know what TFG or ffr May 2023 #21
Don't be surprised if we see Biden do exactly this in an Address to the Nation... Joinfortmill May 2023 #24
Right. Biden knows exactly what to do, and will have the national audience's support. ancianita May 2023 #25
And PJB is Determined to STOP Cha May 2023 #31
The 14th Amendment allows the President to take lawful actions to prevent default on our debt LetMyPeopleVote May 2023 #26
"...nobody has standing in court to challenge the President." ancianita May 2023 #28
Indeed. Time for Biden to channel his inner Willy Wonka. thesquanderer May 2023 #29
LOL. Totally! ancianita May 2023 #30
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Laurence Tribe -- Why I C...