Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

canetoad

(20,920 posts)
Mon May 15, 2023, 02:20 AM May 2023

'I was 13. I thought that's what was expected of me' [View all]

Three clicks. That’s all it takes to move from a popular adult site’s homepage to a video in which men dressed as soldiers rape a screaming “village girl”. Three more clicks and there’s a naked teenager crying helplessly as a man puts his hand around her neck against her will.

The videos are free. And none of the world’s most popular porn sites visited by this masthead, which show men treating women with violence and coercion prohibited under Australian law, stipulated the content was for adults, or required users to check a box confirming that they were over 18.

Amid deepening concern that adolescents’ easy, free access to a vast array of adult material is normalising gendered violence in adolescent sex – some teens say their first sexual experience involved a hand around their neck – the nation will soon begin debating whether to restrict access to minors. Those concerned include the NSW’s Children’s Court president and the head of the state’s child abuse squad.

The eSafety Commission has handed in its report on how Australia could introduce an age verification road map to the federal government, a move that could also restrict children’s access to violent gaming and gambling. Age restriction can range from government-issued “certificates” to technology that scans a user’s facial characteristics to assess their age. The government is due to respond soon.

More: https://archive.md/TfwL7
Or: https://www.theage.com.au/national/i-was-13-i-thought-that-s-what-was-expected-of-me-20230426-p5d3fh.html

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good luck, and I mean that sincerely Hekate May 2023 #1
Thanks pal canetoad May 2023 #2
OK as long as you have reached a certain age? ahlnord May 2023 #3
The article is about teens canetoad May 2023 #4
+1000000000000 chowder66 May 2023 #5
If it makes you feel any better ... Hugh_Lebowski May 2023 #6
It Is An Interesting Conundrum, Sir The Magistrate May 2023 #7
Florida CONservatives restrict rights-affirming sex education for children. Perpetuates attitudes Bernardo de La Paz May 2023 #8
Why is... 2naSalit May 2023 #9
We could pose the same question regarding physical abuse. Marcuse May 2023 #10
Okay... 2naSalit May 2023 #11
I'd posit vicarious living, for the most part. Marcuse May 2023 #12
Vicarious relief of frustration. malthaussen May 2023 #13
... 2naSalit May 2023 #14
I have plenty of thoughts on it too. malthaussen May 2023 #15
I agree with you. Kinda disgusting people defend this shit. Brenda May 2023 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»'I was 13. I thought that...