Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
4. Some very basic distortions of facts in this article.
Thu Nov 9, 2023, 12:33 PM
Nov 2023

Since the founding of Israel, and until the Camp David Accord in 1978, no Arab country recognized Israel's right to exist.

Since the founding of Israel, and until the Oslo accord in 1993, no Palestinian leader recognized Israel's right to exist.

So it is ridiculous and revisionist to claim that the phrase "from the river to the sea" in the 1960's meant anything other than annihilation of Israel as a sovereign entity . It has never been "a rallying cry for the liberation of Palestinian people across the region, from Gaza to the West Bank and within Israel", least of all representative of the 2 million Israeli Palestinians with full rights of Israeli citizenship.Hamas in particular, but not exclusively among the Palestinian factions, is still calling for the annihilation of Israel, and never ceased to threaten violence.

There can be no question what the phrase really means. People who are not calling for the destruction of Israel have ways of expressing support for the Palestinians other than this loaded phrase. This feeble attempt to deny the obvious is disingenuous and deceptive at best.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's hardly thinly veiled Richard D Nov 2023 #1
I do appreciate our American media. They've taught me how to recognize propaganda when I hear it. Autumn Nov 2023 #2
Same people and same genes. multigraincracker Nov 2023 #3
Some very basic distortions of facts in this article. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #4
I don't know of any historical example of one nation or peoples Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #6
This is not a matter of recognizing a nation. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #7
Were there any representatives of the Palestinian people at the negotiating table? Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #8
Of course there were Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #9
That's not what it says here? Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #10
Balfour declaration? Did Balfour partition the mandatory Palestine into two states? Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #12
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #13
Yep, proposed, rejected by Arabs, and adopted in spite of their rejection. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #14
So they were made an offer, they couldn't refuse? n/t Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #15
They were made an offrer, and they refused. This is factual. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #17
I can understand that, Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #18
No it is not. It is like refusing a seat at the negotiating table. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #11
I learned something from that article RainWalker Nov 2023 #5
There were and are such. Igel Nov 2023 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»How interpretations of th...»Reply #4