Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
12. Balfour declaration? Did Balfour partition the mandatory Palestine into two states?
Thu Nov 9, 2023, 06:56 PM
Nov 2023

You are looking at the wrong reference.

Here is the page about the UN partition:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

Reactions
Jews

Jews gathered in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem to celebrate the U.N. resolution during the whole night after the vote. Great bonfires blazed at Jewish collective farms in the north. Many big cafes in Tel Aviv served free champagne.[12][8] Mainstream Zionist leaders emphasized the "heavy responsibility" of building a modern Jewish State, and committed to working towards a peaceful coexistence with the region's other inhabitants:[106][107] Jewish groups in the United States hailed the action by the United Nations. Most welcomed the Palestine Plan but some felt it did not settle the problem.[108]

--snip--

Arabs

Arab leaders and governments rejected the plan of partition in the resolution and indicated that they would reject any other plan of partition.[14] The Arab states' delegations declared immediately after the vote for partition that they would not be bound by the decision, and walked out accompanied by the Indian and Pakistani delegates.[119]

They argued that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[5][16] The Arab delegations to the UN issued a joint statement the day after that vote that stated: "the vote in regard to the Partition of Palestine has been given under great pressure and duress, and that this makes it doubly invalid."[120]

On 16 February 1948, the UN Palestine Commission reported to the Security Council that: "Powerful Arab interests, both inside and outside Palestine, are defying the resolution of the General Assembly and are engaged in a deliberate effort to alter by force the settlement envisaged therein."[121}

--snip--

Retrospect

In 2011, Mahmoud Abbas stated that the 1947 Arab rejection of United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a mistake he hoped to rectify.[163]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's hardly thinly veiled Richard D Nov 2023 #1
I do appreciate our American media. They've taught me how to recognize propaganda when I hear it. Autumn Nov 2023 #2
Same people and same genes. multigraincracker Nov 2023 #3
Some very basic distortions of facts in this article. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #4
I don't know of any historical example of one nation or peoples Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #6
This is not a matter of recognizing a nation. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #7
Were there any representatives of the Palestinian people at the negotiating table? Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #8
Of course there were Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #9
That's not what it says here? Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #10
Balfour declaration? Did Balfour partition the mandatory Palestine into two states? Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #12
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #13
Yep, proposed, rejected by Arabs, and adopted in spite of their rejection. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #14
So they were made an offer, they couldn't refuse? n/t Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #15
They were made an offrer, and they refused. This is factual. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #17
I can understand that, Uncle Joe Nov 2023 #18
No it is not. It is like refusing a seat at the negotiating table. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #11
I learned something from that article RainWalker Nov 2023 #5
There were and are such. Igel Nov 2023 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»How interpretations of th...»Reply #12