Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(37,221 posts)
18. Interesting line of thought. Thanks.
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 02:10 PM
Apr 2024

I tend to think that people who are intellectually lazy inevitably acquire fears and prejudices that keep them that way.

As for anti-intellectual undercurrents, I also think that the era of those currents is behind us now, as youth reject it out of hand, and are trying to 'future proof' their lives.

Since the 90's when I was on the nets, I've generally seen that the internet has made people more of what they'd already been inclined or groomed toward, anyway. So, they either use news to learn new information and kept their maps of reality progressively up-to-date, or used "news" to validate whatever level of learning they've stopped at, and their maps of reality stagnated. They used to approach print media the same way, when they even bothered to read, and not just get it all through second- or thirdhand reports of their social/political circles.

Overall, I've seen how Democrats have been dragging the underinformed cult kicking and screaming into the 21st Century; their rw billionaire oligarchs trying to structurally block us from doing that, but the majority of Americans already have seen and felt the harm caused by the cult's insistence on their "freedumbs," and withdrawal from the rest of the world with their cynical "amerikkka first" stupidity.

It's why, according to Simon Rosenberg, Democrats have been kicking ass in elections since 2018. We'll do it again in 2024, whether corporate media helps or not.

Who's going to pay reporters' salaries? NT mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2024 #1
That's why they charge for multigraincracker Apr 2024 #3
Set up a system where non-locals can by a generic subscription to access Wonder Why Apr 2024 #16
How do they stay afloat. RandySF Apr 2024 #2
First, the article cites that all the major sites listed in the OP ancianita Apr 2024 #5
That makes no sense. Progressive dog Apr 2024 #4
Not to you. But ancianita Apr 2024 #6
"Have you seen the profit margins of corporate media?" mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2024 #7
Obviously dropping paywalls will Progressive dog Apr 2024 #9
Not obviously. ancianita Apr 2024 #10
Exactly Progressive dog Apr 2024 #11
Not exactly. ancianita Apr 2024 #12
So temporarily money losing companies will lose Progressive dog Apr 2024 #14
Your argument is with Stengel, not me. He and I believe that corporate media, if they're honest, ancianita Apr 2024 #15
Just fire more reporters or cut their salaries Progressive dog Apr 2024 #17
You're swallowing the corporate hype. Corporate media can afford who/what they want and you know it. ancianita Apr 2024 #19
No I'm following published facts. Progressive dog Apr 2024 #20
Expanding the digital divide. usonian Apr 2024 #8
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make 'em drink. hunter Apr 2024 #13
Interesting line of thought. Thanks. ancianita Apr 2024 #18
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Democracy Dies Behind Pay...»Reply #18