Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

hlthe2b

(114,045 posts)

2. Likewise, prominent legal "analysts" trying to make a name for themselves by 'contrarian' views

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2024, 03:07 PM

May 2024

published in NYT, WSJ, and others. CNN's Elie Honig (NYT opinion piece thism) comes to immediate mind, but there are others. Fortunately, Andrew Weissman professionally and collegially countered this piece on MSNBC a few hours ago. And yes, this is not the first time I have taken issue with Honig--a big reason I won't watch CNN. Then, of course there are the others who have crawled out of academic spaces to make a name for themselves--but think they must do so by disagreeing with everyone else on the most basic of legal pointss.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump allies: Stop debasing our courts. He got a fair trial and could have testified. [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2024 OP

WELL SAID vapor2 May 2024 #1

Likewise, prominent legal "analysts" trying to make a name for themselves by 'contrarian' views hlthe2b May 2024 #2

The rethugs know they are an endangered species and the coming election cycle will see them losing power captain queeg May 2024 #3

Mary Gauthier said it best. bluescribbler May 2024 #4