Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cleduc

(653 posts)
9. "George who was the star anyway"
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 08:05 AM
Aug 2012

All four were popular at the time but George was pretty shy and quiet - arguably had the least star power. Lennon was probably the main mouthpiece when they spoke to the media and was popular with many because of his wit ("Would the people in the cheaper seats clap your hands. And the rest of you, just rattle your jewelry." Performance for Queen Elizabeth and British Royalty). Paul seemed to be regarded as the "cutest" - the ladies seemed to like him the most for that.

Lennon-McCartney wrote the vast majority of their songs and all but a very few of their hits so the music media at the time tended to give them more credit than the other two.

They started out as a pop rock band. Upbeat, catchy melody with fairly straightforward lyrics. But they transformed in front of us and I guess that's a key to why they were so special. Their lyrics evolved to make social statements and some of it was like deep poetry with folks searching for all the meanings. They evolved by using techniques in the studio - way beyond a four piece band and broke new ground there - both with sounds and orchestration backing up some of their songs (George Martin). Their music diversified from simple rock to more complex pieces and a variety of types of music (country, blues, ballads, anthems, some classical overtones, and mixtures, etc) and they broke the 3 minute barrier for a pop song. Throughout that evolution, they produced wonderful melodies that held it together and sustained it's appeal.

I was helping my teenage kids with their ipods. Like other teenagers, I thought they were going through the usual popular artists of the day. But I found both had much of the Beatles collection and they didn't get them from me or their Mom. Like Beethoven I guess, great music will survive the ages.

In 2011, the Beatles were credited with elevating US digital music sales for the first time in a decade when their material became available to iTunes. (somehow my kids had it on their ipods years before) and Abbey Road remained the top selling vinyl album - so the old fans were still buying.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Beatles: Time to let it be? [View all] dipsydoodle Aug 2012 OP
The Counterpoint (From the same article...) Nostradammit Aug 2012 #1
Thanks dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #2
We were pissed when mom insisted on watching.. orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #3
Lost in Space and Ed Sullivan were both CBS programs Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #7
Thanks ,now I'm searching to see the tv schedule orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #8
Could have been Disney Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #10
Guess what ? ' The scarecrow of Romney Marsh ' is just orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #11
Amazing Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #13
I got to talk to Guy Williams once on the telephone. orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #14
They opened up pop music, broke through the formulas that others have played to death... WCGreen Aug 2012 #4
here is why I disagree DonCoquixote Aug 2012 #5
Eloquently Correct!!!!! orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #6
"George who was the star anyway" cleduc Aug 2012 #9
well said TeamPooka Aug 2012 #32
They were overrated. Proud Corporate Dem Aug 2012 #12
Check your Rosetta stone ,,and who rates? orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #15
I don't know but I just never really cared for the Beatles much. They were all on LSD. Proud Corporate Dem Aug 2012 #17
What's a winner look like? orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #18
Try some Barry Manilow if you want some good music. Proud Corporate Dem Aug 2012 #19
I didn't judge , I just wondered . Barry wrote some orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #20
Is that a trivia question? I give up. Proud Corporate Dem Aug 2012 #21
Me too ,Dad didn't care for the Beatles either. orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #22
unless the corporartions you like DonCoquixote Aug 2012 #26
LOL! Politicalboi Aug 2012 #30
are you sure you're in the right place? Dyedinthewoolliberal Aug 2012 #28
LOL! Politicalboi Aug 2012 #29
Disagree. The Beatles were great! LeftishBrit Aug 2012 #16
Eh. Igel Aug 2012 #23
I couldn't help NOT to let this one be: nightscanner59 Aug 2012 #24
Wow! Woof! Great. Didn't even know he did that one. Infectious. Thanks! Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #25
Wasn't released until after he died dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #27
In 1962, how many people were talking about songs from 1912? rug Aug 2012 #31
Some humour from the past - 1963 dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Beatles: Time to let ...»Reply #9