Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

pat_k

(12,695 posts)

3. It's up to the court to decide if a party is granted status as an intervenor.

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Sun Jan 18, 2026, 01:50 AM

Sunday

Nothing that comes out of the felon's DOJ has any basis in the law these days.

Seems to me a member of the body that wrote and passed the law certainly has a legitimate stake in ensuring that law is carried out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

malaise Uncle Joe

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department says members of Congress can't intervene in release of Epstein files [View all] Uncle Joe Saturday OP

Jesus. Now I am wondering if there isn't proof he's a cannibal in those files. Scrivener7 Saturday #1

They said what - Gimme Some Truth malaise Saturday #2

It's up to the court to decide if a party is granted status as an intervenor. pat_k Sunday #3