Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 09:34 AM Sep 2012

Was Newton a scientist or a sorcerer? [View all]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/across-the-universe/2012/sep/21/isaac-newton-scientist-sorcerer


If he hadn't believed in spirits and 'active principles', Newton might not have conceived gravity in the mathematical form we still use today. Photograph: Corbis

Hot on the heels of Isaac Newton's apple appearing at the Paralympics comes a new celebration of his life and achievements. The Gravity Fields Festival begins on Friday in Grantham, Lincolnshire. For eight days, Newton's life and times will be commemorated by more than 100 events around the town, during what could become a biennial event.

Grantham lies close to Newton's birthplace, Woolsthorpe Manor, and contains the King's School, which the young Isaac attended. On Saturday at 3pm a blue plaque in his honour will be unveiled by the Astronomer Royal, Sir Martin Rees.

Often wrongly portrayed as a cold rationalist, Isaac Newton is one of history's most compelling figures. It is true that he was capable of the most precise and logical thought it is possible for a human to achieve: his three years of obsessive work that gave birth to the Principia, containing his theory of gravity, stand as the greatest achievement in science.

Just as certainly, though, he was also consumed with what we would now view as completely unscientific pursuits: alchemy and biblical prophesy.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To be brilliant, you have to believe it magic. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #1
Disagree TlalocW Sep 2012 #2
Not magic, literally, but the magic of the natural world. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #8
No, they extended conventional science DavidDvorkin Sep 2012 #9
To be brilliant, you have to believe it magic. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #10
Nope. DavidDvorkin Sep 2012 #11
We can both be right, you know. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #12
This will make you smile. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #13
And the point of this is? HopelesslyLiberal Sep 2012 #3
This superficial article.... RobertoRoberti Sep 2012 #4
Yes. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #5
You mean people in the 17th century didn't fit into 21st-century pigeonholes? Amazing. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #6
"Photograph"? LOL! Aldo Leopold Sep 2012 #7
Yup. Igel Sep 2012 #14
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Was Newton a scientist or...