Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Dulcinea

(10,166 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:28 AM Yesterday

Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas [View all]

(CNN) President Donald Trump seems to be leaning in on the idea that elderly conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas might think about a conveniently timed retirement this year.

Trump couched his comments to Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo in respect for the jurisprudence and decision-making processes of both justices. But he also repeatedly gestured at the political utility of them retiring soon:

“I think he is one of the great justices of all time,” Trump said of Alito, before adding: “It’d be nice to say, now I have somebody for 40 years.”

https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/16/politics/supreme-court-trump-alito-thomas

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking Yesterday #1
No JBTaurus83 Yesterday #2
51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy Yesterday #5
Epstein. marble falls Yesterday #3
Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter Yesterday #4
It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #6
A worse person than those two pwb Yesterday #7
That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #10
They found Kavanaugh. eggplant Yesterday #11
Probably Cannon and Bondi..... Bettie 5 hrs ago #22
he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt Yesterday #15
- Lemon Lyman 18 hrs ago #20
If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel Yesterday #8
Ideal outcome... homegirl Yesterday #9
I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo Yesterday #12
We need a super majority! BidenRocks Yesterday #13
He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller Yesterday #14
"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat 23 hrs ago #16
I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary 23 hrs ago #17
He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB 22 hrs ago #19
No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB 22 hrs ago #18
Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT? lostincalifornia 18 hrs ago #21
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump leans in on a major...