Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 05:30 PM Jan 2012

How Congress Has Signed Its Own Arrest Warrants in the NDAA Citizen Arrest Act By Naomi Wolf [View all]

http://naomiwolf.org/2011/12/how-congress-is-signing-its-own-arrest-warrants-in-the-ndaa-citizen-arrest-bill/

I never thought I would have to write this: but—incredibly—Congress has now passed the National Defense Appropriations Act, with Amendment 1031, which allows for the military detention of American citizens. The amendment is so loosely worded that any American citizen could be held without due process. The language of this bill can be read to assure Americans that they can challenge their detention — but most people do not realize what this means: at Guantanamo and in other military prisons, one’s lawyer’s calls are monitored, witnesses for one’s defense are not allowed to testify, and one can be forced into nudity and isolation. Incredibly, ninety-three Senators voted to support this bill and now most of Congress: a roster of names that will live in infamy in the history of our nation, and never be expunged from the dark column of the history books.

They may have supported this bill because—although it’s hard to believe—they think the military will only arrest active members of Al Qaida; or maybe, less naively, they believe that ‘at most’, low-level dissenting figures, activists, or troublesome protesters might be subjected to military arrest. But they are forgetting something critical: history shows that those who signed this bill will soon be subject to arrest themselves.

Our leaders appear to be supporting this bill thinking that they will always be what they are now, in the fading light of a once-great democracy — those civilian leaders who safely and securely sit in freedom and DIRECT the military. In inhabiting this bubble, which their own actions are about to destroy, they are cocooned by an arrogance of power, placing their own security in jeopardy by their own hands, and ignoring history and its inevitable laws. The moment this bill becomes law, though Congress is accustomed, in a weak democracy, to being the ones who direct and control the military, the power roles will reverse: Congress will no longer be directing and in charge of the military: rather, the military will be directing and in charge of individual Congressional leaders, as well as in charge of everyone else — as any Parliamentarian in any society who handed this power over to the military can attest.

Perhaps Congress assumes that it will always only be ‘they’ who are targeted for arrest and military detention: but sadly, Parliamentary leaders are the first to face pressure, threats, arrest and even violence when the military obtains to power to make civilian arrests and hold civilians in military facilities without due process. There is no exception to this rule. Just as I traveled the country four years ago warning against the introduction of torture and secret prisons – and confidently offering a hundred thousand dollar reward to anyone who could name a nation that allowed torture of the ‘other’ that did not eventually turn this abuse on its own citizens — (confident because I knew there was no such place) — so today I warn that one cannot name a nation that gave the military the power to make civilian arrests and hold citizens in military detention, that did not almost at once turn that power almost against members of that nation’s own political ruling class. This makes sense — the obverse sense of a democracy, in which power protects you; political power endangers you in a militarized police state: the more powerful a political leader is, the more can be gained in a militarized police state by pressuring, threatening or even arresting him or her...
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you who recommended, quietly but firmly Demeter Jan 2012 #1
K&R n/t Mnemosyne Jan 2012 #2
What's the worst that can happen? Obama issued a signing statement, after all. MNBrewer Jan 2012 #3
Big K&R. blackspade Jan 2012 #4
k&r n/t RainDog Jan 2012 #5
K & R Better Believe It Jan 2012 #6
Coups are for police states where everyone is watched, can't happen here ... oops leveymg Jan 2012 #7
Kr for a rare reality check nt ooglymoogly Jan 2012 #8
Does that include the President of the United States? Samantha Jan 2012 #9
I fervently hope so Demeter Jan 2012 #18
It never does, it seems. nt gateley Jan 2012 #22
K&R - on-board with this! patrice Jan 2012 #10
but Obama can now guarantee his win.... dougolat Jan 2012 #11
I do hope President Obama sticks to his signing statements where he promises tavalon Jan 2012 #12
I am pretty sure if the military ever did rounded up Rex Jan 2012 #13
This article was written December 12th and that language was removed before Obama Welibs Jan 2012 #14
Obviously you haven't done your homework. GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #15
NDAA allows for no such thing. Read Sec. 1031 ingac70 Jan 2012 #16
I did. So did a lot of more expert readers Demeter Jan 2012 #19
Some crackpot being Obama? stuckinarut Jan 2012 #25
Statement by the President on H.R. 1540: ingac70 Jan 2012 #32
It has a few loose ends sid3track3d Jan 2012 #36
Words have meanings, and they chose the word "requirement" for a reason cpwm17 Jan 2012 #38
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2012 #17
A similar article ddickey Jan 2012 #20
Interesting, good point in your article... n/t mrdmk Jan 2012 #21
Thanks ddickey Jan 2012 #23
Can I i_sometimes Jan 2012 #24
It's stunning.... President Obama could of stopped this, but didn't.... midnight Jan 2012 #26
No one who signed this bill will get my vote come election time. Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2012 #27
I agree and thus will not vote for Maria Cantwell or Patty Murray. Citizen Worker Jan 2012 #28
I'm with you dana_b Jan 2012 #29
I've voted for her every election - Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2012 #31
yea let's give it all to the gop. surely they'll handle this much more to our liking leftyohiolib Jan 2012 #33
If Boxer can't win CA without my vote -- Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2012 #34
K&R for liberty. nt Land Shark Jan 2012 #30
Going for another 100 Demeter Jan 2012 #35
I am amazed and grateful that this thread is still kicking Demeter Jan 2012 #37
OMG. Remember Me Jan 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»How Congress Has Signed I...