Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

jaxx

(9,236 posts)

3. I will add this:

Reply to Tx4obama (Original post)

Mon Jan 2, 2012, 08:57 PM

Jan 2012

From Milt Shook:
Here is the final version of NDAA

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf

Now, find the section that creates "indefinite detention."

People are using the wrong bill, not the final one. Anyone who talks about NDAA, cites sections 1022 et seq are using the wrong version of the bill.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Reality Check: Breaking Down Obama’s NDAA Signing Statement [View all] Tx4obama Jan 2012 OP

I give credit to the Pres for the signing statement. I am extremely dissapointed rhett o rick Jan 2012 #1

I never thought I'd see rationales for the Bush Doctrine being spouted on DU. ixion Jan 2012 #2

I got ignored by 3 people earlier for calling it what it is SixthSense Jan 2012 #4

presidential opinion is fascism? yodermon Jan 2012 #9

NDAA is fascism SixthSense Jan 2012 #10

I will add this: jaxx Jan 2012 #3

Good find sellitman Jan 2012 #5

The sections in the final bill ARE 1021 and 1022. Tx4obama Jan 2012 #6

Thanks, he used the wrong number himself. jaxx Jan 2012 #8

Here's a succinct analysis of the legal importance of a signing statement: MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #7

Thanks. RC Jan 2012 #11

Famous last words from the Wiggle Room: GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #12