Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
18. people of modest means R subsidized. If things are that tough, sounds like you could get medicaid.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 09:22 PM
Nov 2012

The ACA does not go into full effect until 2014. IF you need health care before then you can go to the Emergency room at a near-by hospital. But be advised unless you are in pretty serious trouble your wait time to get attention could be considerable. In large cities, if you go to an emergency room without a life threatening condition you probably will get over whatever was bothering you before you are seen by a doctor or nurse.

IN 2014 the ACA goes into full effect and, based on your attested financial situation, you probably will be able to get subsidized and then can afford health care which now you can only dream of.

You are hardly alone though. Many people of consdirable means are finding they can't afford health care (insurance) either. And without the ACA going into effect many (millions) more would have been dropping their insurance as private insurance premiums would have gone beyond many people's ability to afford them. Without the ACA many millions more of us would have been showing up at emergency rooms for health care. Not really a workable solution ... and extremely expensive too. That's why the ACA was necessary.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

not so.... mike_c Mar 2012 #1
I was very pissed off when the Public option was thrown overboard. Bill USA Mar 2012 #2
do not dismay, when the supremes strike down the ACA, single payer will be not far away. Bill USA Mar 2012 #4
+ 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #5
actually I am talking about the law that is being reviewed by the court. you are taking a step back Bill USA Mar 2012 #7
Are you claiming that people in the US do not die because they lack access to health care? Fumesucker Mar 2012 #8
Yes, yes and yes sad sally Mar 2012 #13
SCOTUS + Scalia = The Obama Administration now? Back the truck up. freshwest Mar 2012 #3
Exquisite analysis. Elegant reasoning. I can only say, "I WISH I HAD THOUGHT OF THAT!" JohnWxy Mar 2012 #6
Is it your position that no one in the US dies due to a lack of access to health care? n/t Fumesucker Mar 2012 #9
Earth to Fumesucker - YOu might consider the possibility that you are smoking that 'stuff' too much. JohnWxy Mar 2012 #10
The handle is due to my economic situation, sucking fumes, running on empty.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #16
It's really annoying the way ACA defenders continually collapse insurance with care. EFerrari Mar 2012 #11
what's more annoying is how many DUers can't stay within the scope of a thread. If you want to start Bill USA Mar 2012 #14
Try reading your own thread. nt EFerrari Mar 2012 #15
charity hospitals greymattermom Mar 2012 #12
empty wallet string Nov 2012 #17
people of modest means R subsidized. If things are that tough, sounds like you could get medicaid. Bill USA Nov 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nobody is being FORCED to...»Reply #18