Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lalalu

(1,663 posts)
9. That is exactly what I am saying.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 03:29 PM
Nov 2012

There are democrats on board the privatizing of public education. Emanuel made no secret of his push for charter schools and yet he won with a large portion of the urban and black vote.

We need to take the attack on public education as seriously as the attack on social security. We need to educate the public about what is going on. You would be surprised at the people who are turning their backs on public education.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Agree this is bad but lalalu Nov 2012 #1
I disagree about the source of pressure: it's coming from people with money yurbud Nov 2012 #3
Yes, the pressure is coming from people with money. lalalu Nov 2012 #8
that explanation also doesn't hold up when you consider that Arne is consistent with the appointment yurbud Nov 2012 #6
That is exactly what I am saying. lalalu Nov 2012 #9
Rahm probably won in spite of that not because of it, given the recent dust up yurbud Nov 2012 #10
It's a mistake to say that because you and I don't like it, it's not something other Democrats do. Igel Nov 2012 #13
progressives don't like the lack of "accountability" because it is the stick used to beat regular yurbud Nov 2012 #17
I have thought for a long time that Arne should be gone Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #2
the concept of charters is not bad, but the way to keep it honest is it should come from yurbud Nov 2012 #4
I don't really understand what you mean. If it comes from the public school teachers and Squinch Nov 2012 #7
in the sense that it is free from some of the regulation and curriculum requirements and is more yurbud Nov 2012 #11
I think if you DID allow public schools to do that again, a lot of the problems in education would Squinch Nov 2012 #14
they are separate in terms of supervision, but they can leech resources and even buildings yurbud Nov 2012 #18
Yes. This is true. And the charter schools are always visibly better funded too. Squinch Nov 2012 #23
He would be gone, except that Doctor_J Nov 2012 #21
Charter schools are a disaster. As is high stakes testing. Squinch Nov 2012 #5
you're right. teachers try to work around it but my wife teaches K-12 and her principal comes yurbud Nov 2012 #12
I am not a teacher but I work closely with teachers. What I see is that the children who truly Squinch Nov 2012 #15
that's a good summary yurbud Nov 2012 #16
Good post. recommended. Bill USA Nov 2012 #19
More triangulation from the president Doctor_J Nov 2012 #20
But, the message from 2012 is: If the other side is bad enough, then YOU can get away with anything. FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»BAD bipartisanship: Obama...»Reply #9