Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

yurbud

(39,405 posts)

18. they are separate in terms of supervision, but they can leech resources and even buildings

Reply to Squinch (Reply #14)

Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:28 PM

Nov 2012

they have one idea that is especially insidious: co-location.

If a public school has un or under-utilized space, a charter can claim it and set up shop there. So all of the sudden, a gym or auditorium is no longer available to the regular school.

And if the charter should leak over into spaces the real public school needs, who is the real school going to appeal to to get them out?

District administrators know which side politicians fall on, and they don't get those jobs by being rebels.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BAD bipartisanship: Obama ed sec to speak at Jeb Bush public ed privatization conference [View all] yurbud Nov 2012 OP

Agree this is bad but lalalu Nov 2012 #1

I disagree about the source of pressure: it's coming from people with money yurbud Nov 2012 #3

Yes, the pressure is coming from people with money. lalalu Nov 2012 #8

that explanation also doesn't hold up when you consider that Arne is consistent with the appointment yurbud Nov 2012 #6

That is exactly what I am saying. lalalu Nov 2012 #9

Rahm probably won in spite of that not because of it, given the recent dust up yurbud Nov 2012 #10

It's a mistake to say that because you and I don't like it, it's not something other Democrats do. Igel Nov 2012 #13

progressives don't like the lack of "accountability" because it is the stick used to beat regular yurbud Nov 2012 #17

I have thought for a long time that Arne should be gone Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #2

the concept of charters is not bad, but the way to keep it honest is it should come from yurbud Nov 2012 #4

I don't really understand what you mean. If it comes from the public school teachers and Squinch Nov 2012 #7

in the sense that it is free from some of the regulation and curriculum requirements and is more yurbud Nov 2012 #11

I think if you DID allow public schools to do that again, a lot of the problems in education would Squinch Nov 2012 #14

they are separate in terms of supervision, but they can leech resources and even buildings yurbud Nov 2012 #18

Yes. This is true. And the charter schools are always visibly better funded too. Squinch Nov 2012 #23

He would be gone, except that Doctor_J Nov 2012 #21

Charter schools are a disaster. As is high stakes testing. Squinch Nov 2012 #5

you're right. teachers try to work around it but my wife teaches K-12 and her principal comes yurbud Nov 2012 #12

I am not a teacher but I work closely with teachers. What I see is that the children who truly Squinch Nov 2012 #15

that's a good summary yurbud Nov 2012 #16

Good post. recommended. Bill USA Nov 2012 #19

More triangulation from the president Doctor_J Nov 2012 #20

But, the message from 2012 is: If the other side is bad enough, then YOU can get away with anything. FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #22