Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

silhouete2

(80 posts)
9. Yep
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 01:14 PM
Nov 2012

Privatization isn't the panacea all these people want you to believe. It does NOT benefit the kids, it benefits the investors and those who run the "corporate" school. There are reasons we have public and private domains. What you described in your post is a perfect example of why they are separated. This stuff is even creaping into public schools. In my district--3 of the 4 higher ups--the superintendent and 2 of the asst. supers, have NEVER taught in a classroom. They gradudated from the business model program for superintendents. OUr Super is always gloating about all the millions he has "saved" the district--by cutting bussing for our neediest kids, cutting back on support personnel, bigger class sizes, making hte teachers give up pay to cut days in school in order to save librarians, counselors---and he is PROUD of all the money the district has in the bank. Why we are saving it, we still aren't sure. He said it was for bad times, and we cetainly are in them now. Wonder if by the passage of Prop 30 in CA if he will start letting some of that go and reinvest in our schools. We also wonder if he will continue to cut from programs to "save money". Time will tell--but it is a crying shame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Expose of Charter School ...»Reply #9