Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

getdown

(525 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 09:44 PM Jan 2012

Staying awake: Notes on the alleged decline of reading By Ursula K. Le Guin [View all]

Staying awake:
Notes on the alleged decline of reading
By Ursula K. Le Guin
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081907

<snip>

Books are social vectors, but publishers have been slow to see it. They barely even noticed book clubs until Oprah goosed them. But then the stupidity of the contemporary, corporation-owned publishing company is fathomless: they think they can sell books as commodities.

Moneymaking entities controlled by obscenely rich executives and their anonymous accountants have acquired most previously independent publishing houses with the notion of making quick profit by selling works of art and information. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that such people get sleepy when they read. Within the corporate whales are many luckless Jonahs who were swallowed alive with their old publishing house—editors and such anachronisms—people who read wide awake. Some of them are so alert they can scent out promising new writers. Some of them have their eyes so wide open they can even proofread. But it doesn’t do them much good. For years now, most editors have had to waste most of their time on an unlevel playing field, fighting Sales and Accounting.

In those departments, beloved by the CEOs, a “good book” means a high gross and a “good writer” is one whose next book can be guaranteed to sell better than the last one. That there are no such writers is of no matter to the corporationeers, who don’t comprehend fiction even if they run their lives by it. Their interest in books is self-interest, the profit that can be made out of them—or occasionally, for the top executives, the Murdochs and other Merdles, the political power they can wield through them; but that is merely self-interest again, personal profit.

And not only profit but growth. If there are stockholders, their holdings must increase yearly, daily, hourly. The AP article ascribed “listlessness” and “flat” book sales to the limited opportunity for expansion. But until the corporate takeovers, publishers did not expect expansion; they were quite happy if their supply and demand ran parallel, if their books sold steadily, flatly. How can you make book sales expand endlessly, like the American waistline?

Michael Pollan explains in The Omnivore’s Dilemma how you do it with corn. When you’ve grown enough corn to fill every reasonable demand, you create unreasonable demands—artificial needs. So, having induced the government to declare corn-fed beef to be the standard, you feed corn to cattle, who cannot digest corn, tormenting and poisoning them in the process. And you use the fats and sweets of corn by-products to make an endless array of soft drinks and fast foods, addicting people to a fattening yet inadequate diet in the process. And you can’t stop these processes, because if you did profits might become listless, even flat.

This system has worked only too well for corn, and indeed throughout American agriculture and manufacturing, which is why we increasingly eat junk and make junk while wondering why tomatoes in Europe taste like tomatoes and foreign cars are well engineered.

more at link
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081907

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you for posting this article by one of my favorite authors. classof56 Jan 2012 #1
you're welcome! getdown Jan 2012 #2
well, she's factually wrong on the cow corn. provis99 Jan 2012 #3
she didn't say they can't eat corn getdown Jan 2012 #5
Cows digest corn. provis99 Jan 2012 #10
Have you read the Pollan book? getdown Jan 2012 #11
cows are designed to eat grass eilen Jan 2012 #18
bookmarked for later Blue_Tires Jan 2012 #4
good read! getdown Jan 2012 #6
IMO Most "popular" novels are formulaic garbage. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #7
yeah, have you read LeGuin? getdown Jan 2012 #8
Yup. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #9
LOVE Ursula. Thanks! nt Fire Walk With Me Jan 2012 #12
Yes! getdown Jan 2012 #15
I do find it curious that she entirely exboyfil Jan 2012 #13
"skipped over"? getdown Jan 2012 #14
4 years old, but so what? Still well worth reading... JHB Jan 2012 #16
all 3 points are true getdown Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Staying awake: Notes on t...