Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:07 AM Jan 2013

Current TV. How Gore had a chance for a revolution and failed. [View all]

I just read this thoughtful article from The Hollywood Reporter. The picture of Keith Olbermann caught my eye.

How Al Gore Lost Current From the Start (Analysis)




In 2005, Al Gore and his business partner Joel Hyatt announced in San Francisco that their new cable channel, Current, was going to be revolutionary. Gore made lots of pronouncements about youth and modern media, and it seemed, if you cut through all the spin, that Current was going to be a cable channel dedicated to something different: It was going to be about social change. As if to hammer home that point, the launch party featured Sean Penn and Leonardo DiCaprio.

..."One thing, however, was very clear to Gore -- what Current would not be: "We have no intention of being a Democratic channel, a liberal channel or a TV version of Air America," he said. "That's not what we're all about. We are about empowering this generation of young people in the 18-to-34 population to engage in a dialogue of democracy and to tell their stories of what's going on in their lives, in the dominant medium of our time."


Except that is exactly what we needed back then bigtime. We needed a channel that was not afraid to tell the truth as they see it. I am thinking that now for 500 million we might have that channel in Al Jazeera.


.."This is what David Bohrman, president of programming for Current, said when he and Gore sat before us at the Television Critics Association winter press tour in January 2012: “So we are really, really excited about what we’re doing. Bringing Keith Olbermann to Current was the trigger, the transformational spark that showed Joel Hyatt and Al what we needed to be, what we could be, what the audience, conceivably what their appetite was for this kind of programming. So I was brought on board to help build it, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.”


Except by that time Olbermann was gone.

When the news of Current’s sale to Al Jazeera broke, there were no Sean Penn or Leonardo DiCaprio sightings. There was no talk of a youth revolution overturning staid media. There was only shock that a channel that never found out what it wanted to be and one almost no one watched was sold for a whopping $500 million.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remind me, what happened with Olbermann? snot Jan 2013 #1
he was a pain in the ass and he was fired w/ just cause Botany Jan 2013 #2
Just to be clear, fired by Current? snot Jan 2013 #5
That might be correct, but IIRC, Festivito Jan 2013 #10
I think he was suspended for a week or two RudynJack Jan 2013 #15
Sadly true. nt awoke_in_2003 Jan 2013 #7
My view...he did not toe the line. madfloridian Jan 2013 #3
By "toe the line" you mean "not show up to do color commentary during the Iowa caucuses?" MADem Jan 2013 #6
He's been fired by every employer he's had RudynJack Jan 2013 #8
Given our M$M, that's not necessarily a bad thing. /nt Festivito Jan 2013 #16
Yeah, it kinda is. /nt RudynJack Jan 2013 #17
Going to guess that Hannity and O'Reilly are also pains in the ass...yet...n/t libdem4life Jan 2013 #4
No doubt they are RudynJack Jan 2013 #9
FTR...I love Olberrmann and can't judge what went down...but wonder why the Left libdem4life Jan 2013 #13
I've thought long and hard about RudynJack Jan 2013 #14
Liberals think, question, look ahead,critically think. RW just the opposite...follow the dittoheads libdem4life Jan 2013 #21
$460 million gain is a "loss"? Plus, cable TV sucks and cost way too much. just1voice Jan 2013 #11
Not a loss for Gore. madfloridian Jan 2013 #23
Great write-up. jsr Jan 2013 #12
I think that Al Gore is such a Serious Person he couldn't get it together like Colbert or Stewart. KoKo Jan 2013 #18
I missed that Howard Dean story--got a link? yurbud Jan 2013 #24
Sideways to your OP, but not totally unrelated and worth noting: PETRUS Jan 2013 #19
+1 ...thanks for adding this "Good Read" to this post! KoKo Jan 2013 #20
That makes me wonder... madfloridian Jan 2013 #22
I totaly understood why Al gore would not sell too Glenn Beck AKA Blaze Network.. PrincetonTiger2009 Jan 2013 #25
Al Jezeera has done some very good articles that our media missed. madfloridian Jan 2013 #27
al jazeera on the tv and miller on the radio madrchsod Jan 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Current TV. How Gore had ...