Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
14. I've thought long and hard about
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jan 2013

this question over the years. The best answer I can come up with is that liberals simply don't want listen to an omniscient voice that tells them what to believe. Rushbots LOVE that. They don't have to think for themselves - the radio tells them what to believe. FOX viewers can get their views reinforced without real information.

Those on the left are more questioning, less trusting of authority, more skeptical.

Even on this board, look how often people will attack good liberals for the slightest infraction. We could have a media hero in people like Maddow or O'Donnell or the like, but we don't allow that. I've seen Carville reviled. Hell, even Presidents Clinton and Obama are routinely attacked here. We suck at sticking together behind someone. The right stood behind George W. Bush no matter what.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Remind me, what happened with Olbermann? snot Jan 2013 #1
he was a pain in the ass and he was fired w/ just cause Botany Jan 2013 #2
Just to be clear, fired by Current? snot Jan 2013 #5
That might be correct, but IIRC, Festivito Jan 2013 #10
I think he was suspended for a week or two RudynJack Jan 2013 #15
Sadly true. nt awoke_in_2003 Jan 2013 #7
My view...he did not toe the line. madfloridian Jan 2013 #3
By "toe the line" you mean "not show up to do color commentary during the Iowa caucuses?" MADem Jan 2013 #6
He's been fired by every employer he's had RudynJack Jan 2013 #8
Given our M$M, that's not necessarily a bad thing. /nt Festivito Jan 2013 #16
Yeah, it kinda is. /nt RudynJack Jan 2013 #17
Going to guess that Hannity and O'Reilly are also pains in the ass...yet...n/t libdem4life Jan 2013 #4
No doubt they are RudynJack Jan 2013 #9
FTR...I love Olberrmann and can't judge what went down...but wonder why the Left libdem4life Jan 2013 #13
I've thought long and hard about RudynJack Jan 2013 #14
Liberals think, question, look ahead,critically think. RW just the opposite...follow the dittoheads libdem4life Jan 2013 #21
$460 million gain is a "loss"? Plus, cable TV sucks and cost way too much. just1voice Jan 2013 #11
Not a loss for Gore. madfloridian Jan 2013 #23
Great write-up. jsr Jan 2013 #12
I think that Al Gore is such a Serious Person he couldn't get it together like Colbert or Stewart. KoKo Jan 2013 #18
I missed that Howard Dean story--got a link? yurbud Jan 2013 #24
Sideways to your OP, but not totally unrelated and worth noting: PETRUS Jan 2013 #19
+1 ...thanks for adding this "Good Read" to this post! KoKo Jan 2013 #20
That makes me wonder... madfloridian Jan 2013 #22
I totaly understood why Al gore would not sell too Glenn Beck AKA Blaze Network.. PrincetonTiger2009 Jan 2013 #25
Al Jezeera has done some very good articles that our media missed. madfloridian Jan 2013 #27
al jazeera on the tv and miller on the radio madrchsod Jan 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Current TV. How Gore had ...»Reply #14