Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Geoff R. Casavant

(2,381 posts)
7. That 15-20% doesn't represent only profit
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jan 2012

It's overhead (advertising, employee compensation and costs, rent, utilities, etc.) and profit. I think most insurance companies already pay around 75-80% of general revenues in actual care so basically you're looking at a bump of 5% or so. The overhead stuff can't really be reduced much without the kind of adverse effect on business that loses customers, so it comes out of profit.

I think your reasoning may be off in your second sentence -- the only real source of revenue for a health insurance company is what is paid in premiums, so the more they spend on care, the less there is for profit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why the ACA is the death ...»Reply #7