Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
7. The Japanese diplomats that wanted to surrender didn't have clout.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:46 AM
Jan 2013

And had they openly stated that they wanted to surrender they would've been in deep shit. The diplomats that wanted to surrender made that known clandestinely. This analysis also ignores Japan's cultural concept of "kokutai."

I think this discussion would benefit from my clarifying that I am talking about unconditional surrender here. Not conditional surrender. I think it is well known that they would've surrendered if the Empire maintained power (and its territories), without question. I do not think that a reality exists where the USA would've accepted anything but an unconditional surrender and the end of the Japanese Empire, which is why I think that the fighting would've continued on and the fire bombings would've persisted for months.

There is absolutely plenty of evidence for a conditional surrender, particularly the scenario where the Japanese Empire is allowed to stand.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Real Reason America U...»Reply #7