Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ChazInAz

(3,016 posts)
9. Testing would be straightforward.
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 08:08 PM
Feb 2013

We already have two DNA samples from descendants of the boys' aunt that were used to identify Richard. Both skeletons in the urn still have most of their teeth. Obtaining material from them would be fairly simple.
Of course, we'll still never know who killed them. They may actually have died of natural causes, since the examination showed signs of dental abscesses. If so, that naturally leads one to wonder why Richard didn't mention their deaths.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why the princes in the to...»Reply #9